Roblox Username & User ID* Alia9055:1522073716
Example: username:1000000

Discord ID* 834081664766181437
Example: 709881578058285127

Staff Member Who Banned You (Optional)
If known, please include the name of the staff member who issued the ban. This helps us review the situation faster.

What Happened?* So, on 17/04/25 at probably 6 PM, I was with somebody, and he was non-stop opening this troopers trunk. I went to lick the guy's trunk in roleplay, so now they think that I was the one that opened it. And it's not really FRP, for opening a CHP troopers trunk, irl you can do that. And his auto lock would not have been turnt on due to his low speeds, and being stopped. And he never roleplayed by saying "locks doors", and with the LAPD vehicles, you cannot even open the doors, so how would anybody know it's locked. This is a false ban. There were other people opening the guys doors.. I did not click it once.

Ban Reason (as stated in the ban message)* FRP

Why Should You Be Unbanned?* I was not the person that opened his vehicle doors, and there was a ton of people on scene. I originally shot him also due to my friend being shot at. He was also breaking roleplay by shouting at us that he would report us for FRP.

Edited Thursday at 06:34 PM4 days by Josh_Laxw

Ban Appeal Review Decision

Appealing User: Alia9055 (Roblox ID: 1522073716)
Discord ID: 834081664766181437
Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 day)
Ban Reason: FRP (Fail Roleplay) – Unlawful vehicle interaction during RP scene
Staff Member: MysticMeadow23
Evidence Reviewed: Video Evidence – https://youtu.be/_bPUapDmkF0
Ban Record:

• 2 Prior Bans (RDM, FRP)

• 2 Prior Warnings (RDM, FRP)

• Multiple internal notes tied to repeat behavior and previous appeals

---

Summary of Appeal:
The user claims they were falsely blamed for opening a trooper’s trunk and argues that the action wasn’t FRP, stating IRL you could open a trunk under certain conditions. They also say another person was repeatedly opening the trunk and that they merely roleplayed “licking” the trunk. They believe the ban is based on a misunderstanding and point to multiple people being present at the scene.

---

Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Pattern of FRP Confirmed

Upon review of the full video evidence and moderation history:

• The clip shows clear and intentional interaction with the vehicle (repeated activation of the trunk during an RP scene with law enforcement), without RP context or justification.

• The "licking the trunk" comment, even if not the direct cause of the interaction, contributes to a scene that escalated into unrealistic and disruptive roleplay.

• Prior moderation history includes multiple FRP-related warnings and a previous ban — this is a continued pattern of pushing unrealistic behavior in serious roleplay scenarios.

Regarding the user’s defense:

• Real-life justifications (e.g., “you could do this IRL”) do not override community standards.

• Vehicles are assumed locked unless otherwise roleplayed. The lack of a /me or /do does not justify forcing interaction with government vehicles during scenes.

• The claim that others were also doing it does not absolve the user of responsibility.

---

Outcome:

• Ban will remain active and expire as scheduled

• No further action will be taken at this time, but this serves as a final notice:

  • Any further FRP incidents will likely result in longer bans or permanent action

  • The user is strongly advised to re-review Section 2.1 – General RP Rules and community conduct standards

Repeat violations, especially after being given multiple chances, will not continue to be tolerated.

— Mountain Interactive Moderation Team
[email protected]
https://mountaininteractive.com/rules