Roblox Username: oliveiras9 Discord ID (Ex. 709881578058285127): 525526242682994692
REPORTING CONTENTS:
Staff Username: ilovchoccake
Discord Username or ID: 833415963877441597
Description Of the Incident: Perhaps the worst MI Mod I’ve ever encountered. Me and my friend were in an in-game call on the perris phones talking through roblox VC for the entire duration of our in-game experience. The scene started when my friend said something a long the lines of "shoot them" after we engaged in a shootout. I was in a house across from him, thus a moderator surmised my friend was metagaming for talking to me outside of the game. Evidence below shows we were in a call during the encounter, note timestamp 3:01 in screenshot. A medal clip shows neither I nor my friend ever pulled out a phone during the staff encounter, thus the timestamp shows that we had been in a call beforehand, as well as screenshots of evidence provided to the moderator right after the staff scene started that he ignored. Staff Report: During the entire encounter, choco ignored constant explanation, disregarding the evidence I provided mere minutes into the encounter and protests from both my friend and I. A simple watch of the medal clip shows I was talking in vc, in response to my friend in game as well. My medal clips games, not external audio. Furthermore, my friend does not even have discord, and if he did why would we be talking in game as well? IT SHOULD BE NOTED, THROUGHOUT THE CLIPS PROVIDED THE VOLUME OF MY FRIEND STAYED MODULATED AND THE SAME, INDICATING IN-GAME COMMUNICATION THROUGH THE PHONE SYSTEM.Perhaps the most frustrating part of this encounter is not only his act of ignoring the evidence and explanations for over 10 minutes, but his misuse of the rule metagaming. As stated in the rules, simply the act of communicating does not constitute meta-gaming. As we had been communicating and playing in-character, however the information gained in-character was delivered should not matter as it was NOT OOC. So, even IF we had been communicating through other means, it should not have mattered. Especially when I’ve seen and played with staff who have used discord to communicate in-game actions before. But, again, as was proven multiple times, we had been in an in-game call through the in-game phone mechanics. In a clip taken from the encounter, the staff says multiple different definitions of meta-gaming, in one case even saying any communication that favors a character constitutes a rule-break, and even in-game mechanics are included in this description. Should two people communicating a distance from their victim be punished simply because they did not include the victim in the conversation? Under his definition, simply the circumstances around a communication, no matter if it is OOC or IC, constitutes a break of meta gaming simply because it favors the individuals communicating. Context medal clip: https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jsUQS3uBb3ctRMhvv?invite=cr-MSw0Y0wsMjQ0NDY5OTM0LA
^Sent to the moderator during the scene
Committed Offenses: Outlined in the text above, but most important: Purposefully ignoring evidence contrary to the scene, being argumentative, being ignorant during his duties, unprofessional, making up rules as well as being wrong about the rules, targeting us, skipping common procedure when punishing someone for minor infractions, taking my words out of context despite explanation, using the absence of evidence as evidence of guilt, being illogical. Time of Occurrence: January 10th at 9:35 PM Additional members involved/witnessing:GeneralSiege
(1)_861fa4.png)
Roblox Username: oliveiras9
Discord ID (Ex. 709881578058285127): 525526242682994692
REPORTING CONTENTS:
Staff Username: ilovchoccake
Discord Username or ID: 833415963877441597
Description Of the Incident: Perhaps the worst MI Mod I’ve ever encountered. Me and my friend were in an in-game call on the perris phones talking through roblox VC for the entire duration of our in-game experience. The scene started when my friend said something a long the lines of "shoot them" after we engaged in a shootout. I was in a house across from him, thus a moderator surmised my friend was metagaming for talking to me outside of the game. Evidence below shows we were in a call during the encounter, note timestamp 3:01 in screenshot. A medal clip shows neither I nor my friend ever pulled out a phone during the staff encounter, thus the timestamp shows that we had been in a call beforehand, as well as screenshots of evidence provided to the moderator right after the staff scene started that he ignored. Staff Report: During the entire encounter, choco ignored constant explanation, disregarding the evidence I provided mere minutes into the encounter and protests from both my friend and I. A simple watch of the medal clip shows I was talking in vc, in response to my friend in game as well. My medal clips games, not external audio. Furthermore, my friend does not even have discord, and if he did why would we be talking in game as well? IT SHOULD BE NOTED, THROUGHOUT THE CLIPS PROVIDED THE VOLUME OF MY FRIEND STAYED MODULATED AND THE SAME, INDICATING IN-GAME COMMUNICATION THROUGH THE PHONE SYSTEM.Perhaps the most frustrating part of this encounter is not only his act of ignoring the evidence and explanations for over 10 minutes, but his misuse of the rule metagaming. As stated in the rules, simply the act of communicating does not constitute meta-gaming. As we had been communicating and playing in-character, however the information gained in-character was delivered should not matter as it was NOT OOC. So, even IF we had been communicating through other means, it should not have mattered. Especially when I’ve seen and played with staff who have used discord to communicate in-game actions before. But, again, as was proven multiple times, we had been in an in-game call through the in-game phone mechanics. In a clip taken from the encounter, the staff says multiple different definitions of meta-gaming, in one case even saying any communication that favors a character constitutes a rule-break, and even in-game mechanics are included in this description. Should two people communicating a distance from their victim be punished simply because they did not include the victim in the conversation? Under his definition, simply the circumstances around a communication, no matter if it is OOC or IC, constitutes a break of meta gaming simply because it favors the individuals communicating. Context medal clip: https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jsUQS3uBb3ctRMhvv?invite=cr-MSw0Y0wsMjQ0NDY5OTM0LA
^Sent to the moderator during the scene
Committed Offenses: Outlined in the text above, but most important: Purposefully ignoring evidence contrary to the scene, being argumentative, being ignorant during his duties, unprofessional, making up rules as well as being wrong about the rules, targeting us, skipping common procedure when punishing someone for minor infractions, taking my words out of context despite explanation, using the absence of evidence as evidence of guilt, being illogical.
Time of Occurrence: January 10th at 9:35 PM
Additional members involved/witnessing:GeneralSiege