Review Notes: CompanyAlpha has expressed unprofessionalism on the multiple instances I saw and engaged him over the span of only an hour. Perhaps the most disconcerting is his complete lack of understanding of the very rules he must enforce. During an instance of false arrest, I called for moderation to help sort out the issue of the false arrest and unlawful use of force, seeing as I have no real avenue of pursuit for legal action in the courts of the game. Per rules in Section 7 (Proper Arrests, No Abuse of Power) and section 3 (Realistic Roleplay) and section 5 (Job Performance, which includes “POLICE OFFICER”) Moderators are obligated to enforce proper arrests and ensure there is no abuse of power, as well as ensure there is realistic roleplay and job performance that is accurate to Perris. All the rules above were broken on the scene when the arresting officers shot an unarmed civilian, unlawfully arrested him for a non-criminal charge, and proceeded with the arrest when the premise/grounds of arrest had no probable cause. Instead of resolving the situation, Moderators CompanyAlpha and nikiee did not do any Rule Enforcement (Outlined in section 8) or investigation, instead offering their own misguided and insubstantial opinions regarding California Law. (More information on mishandling by nikiee in a separate staff report) Below are points in the interaction that constitute my negative review, as well as the above summation.
In the attached medal clip, Timestamp 0:09, CompanyAlpha says “There is no Section 7” TWICE In relation to the perris rules, reflecting his lack of knowledge and understanding of the Perris Rules. Not only is section 7 very real, but is one of the most relevant rules in the game seeing as arrests are a crucial system and commonly used.
In Timestamp 0:50 CompanyAlpha says “We don’t enforce what they arrest you for.” in response to my argument that since the incident was a false arrest, they should at the minimum void the scene. It is explicitly and boldly stated above the perris rules that “The rules outlined in this rulebook are enforced by Community Staff Members.” I find it another expression of his lack of knowledge that he would not know he has to enforce action against false arrests. Under Section 7 It is stated, “Proper Arrests: Police officers must follow realistic procedures for investigating and arresting criminals. Officers are encouraged to roleplay out the arrest process (e.g., reading rights, handcuffing, questioning).” Thus, it is logical to assume, considering there is a rule that pertains to proper arrests under a section of rules proclaimed to be enforced by staff members that indeed you do enforce things pertaining to arrests such as arrest reasons, as how else would a moderator ensure rules 7,5, and 3, all of which contain rules involving either arrests, the performance of an officer (incl. arrests) and proper roleplay (which includes arrests and thus arrest reasons.)
Staff Member: @CompanyAlpha
Review Rating: 0/10
Review Notes: CompanyAlpha has expressed unprofessionalism on the multiple instances I saw and engaged him over the span of only an hour. Perhaps the most disconcerting is his complete lack of understanding of the very rules he must enforce. During an instance of false arrest, I called for moderation to help sort out the issue of the false arrest and unlawful use of force, seeing as I have no real avenue of pursuit for legal action in the courts of the game. Per rules in Section 7 (Proper Arrests, No Abuse of Power) and section 3 (Realistic Roleplay) and section 5 (Job Performance, which includes “POLICE OFFICER”) Moderators are obligated to enforce proper arrests and ensure there is no abuse of power, as well as ensure there is realistic roleplay and job performance that is accurate to Perris. All the rules above were broken on the scene when the arresting officers shot an unarmed civilian, unlawfully arrested him for a non-criminal charge, and proceeded with the arrest when the premise/grounds of arrest had no probable cause. Instead of resolving the situation, Moderators CompanyAlpha and nikiee did not do any Rule Enforcement (Outlined in section 8) or investigation, instead offering their own misguided and insubstantial opinions regarding California Law. (More information on mishandling by nikiee in a separate staff report) Below are points in the interaction that constitute my negative review, as well as the above summation.
In the attached medal clip, Timestamp 0:09, CompanyAlpha says “There is no Section 7” TWICE In relation to the perris rules, reflecting his lack of knowledge and understanding of the Perris Rules. Not only is section 7 very real, but is one of the most relevant rules in the game seeing as arrests are a crucial system and commonly used.
In Timestamp 0:50 CompanyAlpha says “We don’t enforce what they arrest you for.” in response to my argument that since the incident was a false arrest, they should at the minimum void the scene. It is explicitly and boldly stated above the perris rules that “The rules outlined in this rulebook are enforced by Community Staff Members.” I find it another expression of his lack of knowledge that he would not know he has to enforce action against false arrests. Under Section 7 It is stated, “Proper Arrests: Police officers must follow realistic procedures for investigating and arresting criminals. Officers are encouraged to roleplay out the arrest process (e.g., reading rights, handcuffing, questioning).” Thus, it is logical to assume, considering there is a rule that pertains to proper arrests under a section of rules proclaimed to be enforced by staff members that indeed you do enforce things pertaining to arrests such as arrest reasons, as how else would a moderator ensure rules 7,5, and 3, all of which contain rules involving either arrests, the performance of an officer (incl. arrests) and proper roleplay (which includes arrests and thus arrest reasons.)
MEDAL CLIP:
Edited by 1dont1