Roblox Username: SchoolBoy50 Discord ID (Ex. 709881578058285127): 240143516347531264
REPORTING CONTENTS:
Staff Username: rjfrg#0
Discord Username or ID: 1059809829440458855
Description Of the Incident:
For additional context regarding my report, please visit my most recent ban appeal thread found here
After being reported for RDM, the staff member failed to adequately verify the claims of the reporting party and failed to conduct a neutral investigation of the entire incident. Instead, the moderator assumed actions or took the word of the reporting party. When I attempted to give my side of the incident, the moderator countered my statement by using the statement of the reporting party and his incorrect analysis of the footage, then immediately banned me without even trying to get the full story. As provided by the video down below and with the context I provided in my ban appeal, the situation was completely different. This was an active RP scene with a barricaded suspect and the reporting party recklessly interfered and was killed.
The moderator also failed to comment on the FRP of the reporting player entering an active RP scene. In the video, (1) gunshots can be heard, (2) police lights/vehicles can be seen in front of the residence, and (3) gun shots can be heard flying past the reporting party after he entered the residence. The reporting party, who was on foot, ran from another street to the RP scene and used a shotgun to break into the scene. The reporting party then immediate goes straight up stairs and directly to the window officers were engaging with in a manner that seems intentional.
As a moderator, it is important to moderate based on facts. It is also important to gather anecdotal statements from all parties and to use best judgement based on the given facts. Moderators should remain neutral, understanding that all reports may not be genuine or may be a misunderstanding. In this situation, the moderator used solely the anecdotal statement of the reporting party to accuse me of committing an offense (that I have now been proven to not have committed) and refused to hear my complete side of the story.
Committed Offenses:
Unprofessionalism
Biased and Partial Moderation
Failure to Conduct a Legitimate and Neutral Investigation
Roblox Username: SchoolBoy50
Discord ID (Ex. 709881578058285127): 240143516347531264
REPORTING CONTENTS:
Staff Username: rjfrg#0
Discord Username or ID: 1059809829440458855
Description Of the Incident:
For additional context regarding my report, please visit my most recent ban appeal thread found here
After being reported for RDM, the staff member failed to adequately verify the claims of the reporting party and failed to conduct a neutral investigation of the entire incident. Instead, the moderator assumed actions or took the word of the reporting party. When I attempted to give my side of the incident, the moderator countered my statement by using the statement of the reporting party and his incorrect analysis of the footage, then immediately banned me without even trying to get the full story. As provided by the video down below and with the context I provided in my ban appeal, the situation was completely different. This was an active RP scene with a barricaded suspect and the reporting party recklessly interfered and was killed.
The moderator also failed to comment on the FRP of the reporting player entering an active RP scene. In the video, (1) gunshots can be heard, (2) police lights/vehicles can be seen in front of the residence, and (3) gun shots can be heard flying past the reporting party after he entered the residence. The reporting party, who was on foot, ran from another street to the RP scene and used a shotgun to break into the scene. The reporting party then immediate goes straight up stairs and directly to the window officers were engaging with in a manner that seems intentional.
As a moderator, it is important to moderate based on facts. It is also important to gather anecdotal statements from all parties and to use best judgement based on the given facts. Moderators should remain neutral, understanding that all reports may not be genuine or may be a misunderstanding. In this situation, the moderator used solely the anecdotal statement of the reporting party to accuse me of committing an offense (that I have now been proven to not have committed) and refused to hear my complete side of the story.
Committed Offenses:
Unprofessionalism
Biased and Partial Moderation
Failure to Conduct a Legitimate and Neutral Investigation
Time of Occurrence:
1/7/2025, 4:25 AM CST
Video Used as Evidence
- https://youtu.be/UsQOF7hqqes
Moderator Interaction (In Sequence)
Uploading Attachment...
Uploading Attachment...
Uploading Attachment... (Final Interaction Before Ban)