MysticalFlamez - 10724315

mrpilott - 216365449519169537

Staff Member Who Banned You - pokedigge900

For the complete context of the situation, I am providing both accounts. This is my player report against pwrl161. https://mountaininteractive.com/topic/14398-player-report-pwrl161/#comment-37739

And for even more context, here is the PWRL161 report against me. https://mountaininteractive.com/topic/14249-mysticalflamez-nitrp-frp-pd/

Ban Reason FRP, NITRP

Why Should You Be Unbanned?

I was simply matching the roleplay style of everyone involved at the scene. People roleplay at different levels, and I try to adapt to that. In this situation, pwrl161 was roleplaying at a very basic level and was not even roleplaying her actions, so I matched that energy. I know some people prefer deeper roleplay, but in this scenario, I was going with the vibe around me. It is not fair for me to roleplay at the same level as pwrl161 and then be reported for breaking the rules when she was breaking them just as much. How is it fair for someone who is barely roleplaying to hold others to high standards that they are not following themselves? She made comments about some of my actions being unrealistic, but her actions were also unrealistic, yet no violations were found. I believe I deserve a second chance because I was not intentionally FRP or NITRP. I was just matching the energy of the scene. Going forward, I will roleplay at a high standard regardless of how other people are roleplaying, which will help prevent this from happening in the future. I would also appreciate someone reviewing my player report again against pwrl161. I find it extremely hypocritical that I was punished while they walked away scot free, especially when there were clear violations that I highlighted and provided screenshots for in my report.

Unfortunately, I cannot edit the original post, but I found out I was actually moderated for a completely different situation. The clip they used takes everything out of context and is trimmed down to only a small portion of what actually happened. The player had already threatened to kill me as soon as I left the spawn area at Louie's car dealership, and on my screen, I was already out in the intersection making a left turn when they cut me off in front of me. Because of desync, it looks completely different from their side. In my head they had just threatened to kill me, they had a weapon on them, they cut me off, and then they got out of the car and started walking toward me, so I reacted based on what had transpired minutes before. I do not have a clip from my perspective, which hurts me here, but it does not feel fair for the decision to be made off a 16 second clip with zero context. Any time I have ever reported someone and only showed a short 15 to 30 second clip, staff told me they needed more context before they could take action. But in this case, my situation was judged from a small trimmed clip with none of the events that led up to it. All I am asking for is the same standard to be applied to my report and for the full situation to be considered.

After extensive review with other moderators, we believe that this case has a lack of evidence from the appealing side and it will be denied.