I am writing to report a situation that occurred during my patrol, involving two members of the Sheriff’s Department and two other agents from the SBI Below is a detailed explanation of the events and why I believe the actions taken against me were unjustified.
Incident Summary:
While on duty, I saw a backup request from unit 3H88 over the radio. I immediately asked for more information but received no response. Due to the nature of the call and potential risk to the trooper safety, I made the decision to respond Code 3 to assist.
Upon arriving at the location, I did not see any active scene or suspects. Suddenly, an unmarked vehicle initiated a traffic stop on me. The occupants identified themselves as two members of the Sheriff’s Department, claiming I was speeding.
I explained my actions and provided proof (screenshot of my vehicle with ELS on as they requested "CHECK IMAGE 1/2"). Despite this, they refused to release me of the stop.
I then requested SBI to intervene on scene. They arrived but offered little assistance. The situation ultimately ended with me receiving the following citations "CHECK IMAGE 4":
Unsafe Driving of an Emergency Vehicle
Misuse of Emergency Lights
Counter to Citations:
1. Unsafe Driving of an Emergency Vehicle: I was operating my emergency vehicle within the legal and procedural limits of a Code 3 response. My driving was consistent with emergency protocols, with lights and sirens active, and was only initiated after a backup request was made over the radio. Responding urgently to an officer’s call for help cannot reasonably be classified as “unsafe” when proper emergency signals were used and traffic laws for emergency responses were observed.
2. Misuse of Emergency Lights: The emergency lights were activated solely for the purpose of responding to an active backup call. This is a valid and appropriate use of emergency equipment, as outlined in standard operating procedures. There was no personal or unauthorized use of the lights only a justified emergency response to a fellow unit requesting assistance and that did not answer my calls on the radio for further information on the backup request.
Concerns:
The actions of the two Sheriff’s Department players appear to be unreasonable and possibly motivated by personal bias, as they disregarded clear evidence and standard emergency response policy. Additionally, the lack of cooperation from other units on scene further escalated the situation unnecessarily.
I am requesting staff review this situation, including any available radio logs and bodycam/server footage, to address the conduct of the involved players and to void the unjust citations. They made several claims against me, but claims require proof. I presented my side and proved everything I stated, while everything they claimed I countered with evidence. At one point, they even claimed that 3H88 was not present "CHECK IMAGE 2/3", and that I had not told them anything. I purposely did not reveal my proof of 3H88’s presence in that moment to allow staff to see their bias firsthand.
Thank you for your time and assistance in maintaining fairness on the server.
SD_2 : (IC user : Adam Cole) / (Roblox : Kallex320) "bald sheriff" SBI_1 : (IC User : Kayden Murphy) / (Roblox : kagen09) "first SBI agent to arrive on scene"
SBI_2 : (IC User : Adrian Bakerson) "second SBI agent that arrived on scene, in uniform"
Edited by Meliodas Uploaded "FIRST VIDEO" with sound on, we can hear people speaking in the background which I won't let publicly, it's for my privacy.
(1)_55503c.png)
To Staff,
I am writing to report a situation that occurred during my patrol, involving two members of the Sheriff’s Department and two other agents from the SBI Below is a detailed explanation of the events and why I believe the actions taken against me were unjustified.
Incident Summary:
While on duty, I saw a backup request from unit 3H88 over the radio. I immediately asked for more information but received no response. Due to the nature of the call and potential risk to the trooper safety, I made the decision to respond Code 3 to assist.
Upon arriving at the location, I did not see any active scene or suspects. Suddenly, an unmarked vehicle initiated a traffic stop on me. The occupants identified themselves as two members of the Sheriff’s Department, claiming I was speeding.
I explained my actions and provided proof (screenshot of my vehicle with ELS on as they requested "CHECK IMAGE 1/2"). Despite this, they refused to release me of the stop.
I then requested SBI to intervene on scene. They arrived but offered little assistance. The situation ultimately ended with me receiving the following citations "CHECK IMAGE 4":
Unsafe Driving of an Emergency Vehicle
Misuse of Emergency Lights
Counter to Citations:
1. Unsafe Driving of an Emergency Vehicle:
I was operating my emergency vehicle within the legal and procedural limits of a Code 3 response. My driving was consistent with emergency protocols, with lights and sirens active, and was only initiated after a backup request was made over the radio. Responding urgently to an officer’s call for help cannot reasonably be classified as “unsafe” when proper emergency signals were used and traffic laws for emergency responses were observed.
2. Misuse of Emergency Lights:
The emergency lights were activated solely for the purpose of responding to an active backup call. This is a valid and appropriate use of emergency equipment, as outlined in standard operating procedures. There was no personal or unauthorized use of the lights only a justified emergency response to a fellow unit requesting assistance and that did not answer my calls on the radio for further information on the backup request.
Concerns:
The actions of the two Sheriff’s Department players appear to be unreasonable and possibly motivated by personal bias, as they disregarded clear evidence and standard emergency response policy. Additionally, the lack of cooperation from other units on scene further escalated the situation unnecessarily.
I am requesting staff review this situation, including any available radio logs and bodycam/server footage, to address the conduct of the involved players and to void the unjust citations. They made several claims against me, but claims require proof.
I presented my side and proved everything I stated, while everything they claimed I countered with evidence. At one point, they even claimed that 3H88 was not present "CHECK IMAGE 2/3", and that I had not told them anything.
I purposely did not reveal my proof of 3H88’s presence in that moment to allow staff to see their bias firsthand.
Thank you for your time and assistance in maintaining fairness on the server.
Respectfully,
001Meliodas100
[email protected]
Attached links :
FIRST VIDEO https://medal.tv/fr/games/roblox/clips/l93iOmxAS2vvCSj7H?invite=cr-MSx5YXcsNjk5MjgyNjA&v=300
SECOND VIDEO https://medal.tv/fr/games/roblox/clips/l93d2HXHFzXsLmP9d?invite=cr-MSxuU1AsNjk5MjgyNjA&v=300
Attached Images : 1/2/3/4
Attached users :
SD_1 : (IC user : Austin Bateman) / (Roblox : yylfear) "sheriff with hair"
SD_2 : (IC user : Adam Cole) / (Roblox : Kallex320) "bald sheriff"
SBI_1 : (IC User : Kayden Murphy) / (Roblox : kagen09) "first SBI agent to arrive on scene"
SBI_2 : (IC User : Adrian Bakerson) "second SBI agent that arrived on scene, in uniform"
Edited by Meliodas
Uploaded "FIRST VIDEO" with sound on, we can hear people speaking in the background which I won't let publicly, it's for my privacy.