Babyshemtan

I can’t see, aswell. I am banned.

Discord ID: 944720652240318516 Ban Length: Permanent Ban Reason: Vulgar language Why I Should Be Unbanned: Last year, I was banned for using vulgar language against a moderator. The language used wasn’t harsh; however, it was deemed inappropriate to the moderator. For example, one of the sent messages was, “Icl you smell funny.” In response, I was banned indefinitely. I make this appeal to sincerely concede to my mistakes, and ask for a pardon — as I pledge to never repeat the mistakes made. I was in the server for two and half years, with the upmost activity, and sense of community. Additionally, I also believe I served my time. If unbanned, I seek to NEVER disrespect moderators, or even community members. As a commitment to this, I bought Diamond, and want to continue supporting this community. Additional Members Involved/Witnessing: Answer: N/A

I believe so.

I see your proposition. However, I would contend your second nullification. Most RDM gets moderated; however, due to its circumscribed nature, there is a pretty large margin that doesn’t. I also get the subscription premise. The postulation is can be a little absurd—but it significantly improves the quality of role-play in Perris.

The ticket portal is operational. But, David decided to restructure staff—causing transient inefficiencies. It will most likely be resolved within the upcoming week.

Pretty self-explanatory. Making weapons harder to obtain. For starters, this would catalyze a new profound gameplay that actually enriches role-play—rather than successive shootings & violent crimes. It’s a pretty prevailing sentiment that RDM is prevalent in Perris—usually caused by how easy it is to obtain weapons. Stemming off of my previous proposition—It can even be amended by changing the weapons given to subscribers. Illustratively, nobody should be endowed with a LMG, as a resident in a small town located in Southern California. An simple handgun and/or rifle for subscribers would be enough.

Following a discussion that lead to nowhere with David, and the iterative nature of the evaluation process; can I resubmit my application and adduce imperative details I didn’t mention before? Since the paradigmatic evaluation didn’t include crucial, preceding detail. To deter from this: I will apply that into my resubmission of my application.

Glad we can corroborate on this. Please keep me updated on the changes concerning Perris, if possible. Thank you.

@David Small, inconsequential updates don’t count. Look at the dissimilar differences in both games. The Perris map ends with a large disproportionately amended mountain that was done without any punctilious elements; whilst LA ends with a way more detailed, and punctilious scene; Perris has 'archaic' buildings and housing that haven’t been amended for years, and coarse, unprepossessing buildings; whilst LA has a updated city map with actualized ornate structures… The list goes on and on. You guys failed Perris. Everyone in the community knows this. The numbers don’t lie. Focus on your best game.

Perris is indubitably the better game and seriously less-developed. Don’t know why LA is still favored. Perris accumulates way more new players and day-to-day players, it should be consequently amended with MI’s best systems. Don’t know why Perris is neglected in development when it’s the preface of Mountain Interactive.

Suggestion: Suggestion for: Perris. California My Suggestion: Breaking Perris into two different quadrants; Serious RP & Causal RP: Perris should have a whitelisted version to explicate more role-play for players. Perris insinuated as a 'Casual RP' gives more room for violation-breaches and a shooting-playground—nobody in Perris actually has a fun, realistic, and enjoyable experience in Perris because of its concurrent nature, ask the community. Perris is a ER:LC cognate at this point. Why This Would Improve the Game: Better role-playing—what every Perris player wants.

Attached video proof: https://medal.tv/ko/games/roblox/clips/jqsTawCjYl9SMJUe3

My Ban Appeal Appealing Roblox Username: Babyshemtan Appealing Discord ID: 944720652240318516 Ban Length: 2 Days / 00 Minutes / 00 Seconds or Permanent (Please refer to Ban List for this information.) Moderating Staff Member: Sejechrille (Please refer to Ban List for this information.) What game did the ban take place in?: Perris, California Ban Reason: TA, FRP Why I Should Be Unbanned: This entire synopsis was a mere inconsequential error: To briefly evaluate, I endeavored to apprehend a carjacker whom stole a police cruiser. Consequently, he operated the vehicle to S&K where he would exit the cruiser and steal a new vehicle: At the time, I was not acquainted he exited and stole a new vehicle. Reflecting upon first-hand distinguishing, I detained the first person in proximity of the police cruiser. To amend, I cannot see nor interact with the chat to render that he wasn’t the perpetrator; i am on console. In prerequisite to serve viable justice, the person was arrested under carjacking, as i articulated. Later on, I briefly conceded to the factuality of the incident by contacting the arrested person. In further addition, the repercussions should deviate to departmental rather than in-game moderation. This was perplexed incident, not an intentional violation-of-regulations incident. Additional Members Involved/Witnessing: Answer (Optional.)

Staff Member: @wil Review Rating: 10/10 Review Notes: Works diligently. Responds to prompts expeditiously & punctiliously. Reliable administrator.

My Ban Appeal Appealing Roblox Username: Babyshemtan Appealing Discord ID 944720652240318516 Ban Length: 2 Days / 00 Minutes / 00 Seconds or Permanent (Please refer to Ban List for this information.) Moderating Staff Member: Curtis (Please refer to Ban List for this information.) What game did the ban take place in?: Perris, California Ban Reason: RDM Why I Should Be Unbanned: The rationale behind this repercussion is negated: In the video clip, it exhibits only a small portion of the actualized body of this incident. As seen, i was disproportionately positioned facing the opposing players, with a rifle, the other player even produced his own AR and pointed it towards me whilst doing so; subsequently; momentarily, i conclusively discharged my own weapon. The synopsis is more nuanced and additional detail to this could be referred to the original correspondent for the full clip. Additional Members: Nearby officers (name indecipherable)