Jump to content

David

VerifiedFOUNDER & LEADERSHIP PARTNER
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by David

  1. The game is pretty laggy, I'm aware
  2. ☠️
  3. VerifiedDavid replied to Minifyre5's topic in Discussion
    the image is clean, but dont post weird extentions
  4. VerifiedDavid replied to Otike's topic in Completed
    Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: gamerboi77665 (Roblox ID: 2488665020) Discord ID: 843823424781942784 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service), SD (Sexual Dialogue) Staff Member: @Rocky Evidence Reviewed: Discord Mod Log Reference – Ban ID 70196 🧠 Summary of Incident:The user made inappropriate and suggestive comments directed at a female officer during a roleplay arrest scenario in Perris, including phrases such as “hello pretty lady” and a comparison to the character “Baby” from Baby Driver in an attempt to get uncuffed. These comments were interpreted by staff as Sexual Dialogue, leading to a V-TOS violation and resulting in a permanent ban. ✍️ Appeal Summary:The user apologizes and states they did not mean the comments in a creepy or inappropriate way, but rather as part of a playful or cinematic roleplay. They acknowledge how their behavior may have been interpreted negatively and express regret, promising not to repeat it. 🧾 Moderation History:No previous warnings or kicks on record. This is the user's first ban. The ban is marked as permanent, though the behavior was not excessively vulgar or predatory. 📌 Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Ban RemovedAfter internal review, this incident, while inappropriate, does not rise to the level of a permanent ban. The behavior was immature but not overtly malicious or predatory. Given this is your first major infraction and you’ve shown sincere remorse, your ban has been removed. The ban will now automatically expire on April 23, 2025, at 20:38 UTC. ⚠️ Important Notice:Going forward, avoid any kind of suggestive or flirtatious remarks toward other players, especially in law enforcement or arrest scenarios. Whether meant seriously or jokingly, such comments can be uncomfortable or harassing to others and violate our Community Guidelines. If a similar violation occurs again, your account may face permanent suspension without further appeal options. If you have questions, contact [email protected] or open a ticket on our support page. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team
  5. VerifiedDavid posted a topic in Discussion
    test
  6. VerifiedDavid replied to zakhjr's topic in Completed
    Ban Appeal Invalid - Follow the template thanks.
  7. 20250420-2306-06.1509515.mp4
  8. Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: GregCuhh (Roblox ID: 5123084147) Discord ID: 946967202911895623 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: [2.2] Random Deathmatch (RDM) Staff Member: @CompanyAlpha Evidence Reviewed: Clip – Ban ID 70227 Footage Analysis ProcessIn the reviewed clip, the user is seen opening fire on a CHP cruiser driving into the area with no direct initiation or threat made against them. There was no apparent escalation, verbal commands, or hostile interaction preceding the gunfire. The officer was in motion, and no shots were exchanged beforehand. The shooter makes no attempt to verify identity or intent before discharging several magazines into the cruiser, constituting: [2.2] RDM – Unprovoked attack without valid RP initiation. Excessive use of force on a non-hostile target. Moderation History Review[10/11/2024] Warning – Scene Interference [18/4/2025] Warning – RDM [20/4/2025] Ban – Current case (RDM) This is the user's second RDM violation within 2 days and third RP-related infraction overall. Summary of Appeal:The user claims the incident was due to confusion during an intense RP moment and mistook the CHP cruiser for another unit pursuing them. They admit to misidentifying the officer but stress it wasn’t intentional. The user expresses remorse and commits to improved decision-making in future scenarios. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Ban RemainsAlthough the user apologizes and explains the context, the behavior shown in the footage is a textbook example of unjustified lethal force. The officer was not the original pursuer, and no valid RP initiation took place. Additionally, the short time between this incident and the previous RDM warning reinforces a concerning pattern of excessive aggression in RP scenes. Outcome:The 1-day ban will remain active and expire automatically. Future offenses may result in escalated suspension durations. User is advised to carefully review [Section 2.2] of the Community Rules regarding proper PvP engagement and escalation. For any questions, refer to Mountain Interactive Rules or contact [email protected]. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team
  9. Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: memesonly303 (Roblox ID: 2451431736) Discord ID: 916932202984509501 Ban Type: 1 Day Ban Ban Reason: Tool Abuse (TA), Scene Interference (SI), Powergaming / Improper Use of Force Staff Member: caprison4175 Evidence Reviewed: Screenshots submitted in appeal: Screenshot 1 Screenshot 2 Screenshot 3 🧾 Footage & Context Review:The situation escalated after the user (memesonly303) initiated force without staff presence, including cuffing and bean bagging another officer over a body-tampering accusation. The user claims the RCSO officer was moving a body improperly. However, there is no evidence provided in the appeal to support this. The only context available is the screenshots, which do not demonstrate misconduct by the other player. Furthermore, staff were not online and the user chose to unilaterally moderate the situation, which violates established protocol regarding escalation and use of force. The rules prohibit "vigilante moderation" and excessive force without RP justification or authority. ⚖️ Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Improper Use of Force ConfirmedAfter reviewing the evidence and screenshots: The use of the beanbag shotgun and handcuffs was unwarranted without prior RP initiation and outside of proper procedure. The explanation provided in the appeal does not justify the conduct, especially in the absence of video footage and with prior moderation history that includes multiple warnings for RDM, NLR, V-PT, FRP, LTAA, and power gaming patterns. Additionally, despite being told to “leave,” the officer had not escalated force or violated clear RP guidelines on camera. 📌 Outcome:1 Day Ban will remain in place. User has a long moderation history involving 6 warnings and 1 prior ban, all tied to roleplay interference or abuse of tools. The explanation fails to override the repeated nature of violations, and the provided context does not justify the conduct in the appeal. User is advised to refrain from enforcing rules themselves and to record situations properly if they believe others are violating community guidelines. Future appeals without verifiable video evidence or major behavioral change are unlikely to be considered. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected] Moderator Note: I understand the dude was brain rot, however you can't act as the "moderator" and stop him. It looks like he was provoking you to do something. It's best to walk away and go somewhere else and make a report here on our website.
  10. Ban Appeal Review DecisionNote: You can't mug / threaten someone in a public space. Dominos is a public space. Appealing User: Glittersparkles11177 (Roblox ID: 5657993288) Discord ID: 1133310766305525770 Ban Type: Temporary Ban – 2 Days Ban Reason: [2.2] Player versus Player (PvP) – Random Deathmatch (RDM) Staff Member: David D. Evidence Reviewed: https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k6DjpQf7OAHK89qhZ?invite=cr-MSxudkwsMzA5OTc2Mjk4- Footage Analysis ProcessTimestamp Start: Clip begins with the reporting player standing stationary near Domino’s. Suspect Behavior: Glittersparkles11177 walks up with no RP emote or visible initiation. Engagement: The suspect draws a weapon and instantly shoots the reporting player in the back as they walk away. Audio: No in-game audio present in the clip to verify if any verbal RP was made. No threat or visible RP reaction was shown by the victim in the footage. They posed no visible risk and were unarmed. Analysis of Appeal StatementThe user claims they provided an audible warning, saying, “stop moving or I will spark you,” and fired only after the individual did not comply. However, as no voice evidence exists in the clip, this cannot be verified, and the entire scene lacks typed dialogue or reasonable roleplay justification to support this claim. In Mountain Interactive, initiating lethal force still requires clear RP context or a threat. Saying something verbally—especially if undocumented and unrecorded—does not override the need for proper RP escalation. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – RDM ConfirmedThe clip clearly shows the user committing an unjustified shooting without escalation or RP indication. Even if a verbal warning occurred, the use of lethal force for merely walking away does not meet acceptable RP standards. Given the user's recent RDM warning (Apr 17), this forms a repeated violation pattern. Outcome:The 2-day ban will remain active and expire automatically. Any further RDM incidents may result in longer suspensions or escalation to permanent bans. User is reminded to always provide clear in-game RP initiation, especially when using lethal force. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]
  11. VerifiedDavid replied to Zilik797's topic in Completed
    Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Zilik797 (Roblox ID: 1256205123) Discord ID: 899303648423727105 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: SD (Severe Disrespect), PD (Public Disruption), V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service) Staff Member: @DarkShadow_Night157 Evidence Reviewed: Provided Streamable clips (now unavailable) Staff note reviewed Moderation History: No prior bans, warnings, or kicks Summary of Appeal: The user explains the incident involved calling a friend a “monkey” as a joke, which was misinterpreted as racially motivated. They express regret, clarify it wasn’t intended to offend anyone, and note that being placed in a glass cage and laughed at made the situation worse. The user asks for a second chance and reiterates it was not meant in a racist context. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – User Unbanned After full review of the appeal and moderation record: The original ban stemmed from a misunderstanding during an in-game interaction. No prior history of misconduct exists. The clips linked in the original note are no longer accessible, and there’s no way to confirm the tone or full context. The user has taken responsibility and shown maturity in how they’ve approached the appeal. Outcome: Permanent ban has been fully lifted User may rejoin the game and community effective immediately A formal note will remain on the account for future reference, but this incident will not carry further penalty Reminder: Even among friends, avoid using language that can be perceived as inappropriate or offensive. Misinterpretation can escalate quickly, especially in public settings. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Rules & Guidelines [email protected]
  12. Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: RoExplo (Roblox ID: 9171273) Discord ID: 197504392851619840 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: TA (Tool Abuse), FRP (Fail Roleplay), LTAP (Leave to Avoid Punishment) Staff Member: @PreacherVerse Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70277 Evidence – Medal Clip Moderation History: No prior warnings or kicks First ban on record Summary of Appeal: User claims they were confused during the RP scenario, believed the officer attempting a stop was acting incorrectly, and chose to disengage from the situation. They state they were unaware staff were involved or that their behavior constituted a punishable offense. User also denies any malicious intent and believes no prior communication was made before the ban was issued. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Moved to a Warning After full review: LTAP is supported by the video evidence, as the user left an active RP scenario to avoid potential arrest or staff action. FRP and TA are partially valid, as misuse of police equipment and refusal to engage with legitimate RP were observed. However, considering the lack of prior history and the user’s genuine confusion and cooperation in the appeal, a permanent ban is deemed excessive for a first offense. The moderation team agrees that the situation could have benefited from live communication or a short-term ban, not a permanent one. Outcome: Permanent ban lifted Reduced to Warning Record will remain for internal reference Further violations of the rules will result in stricter punishments moving forward User is advised to review all RP and community rules before returning to the game: https://mountaininteractive.com/rules For any questions, contact: [email protected] — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team
  13. Hi, Mistake made. Moderation record void.
  14. Report Review: Vehicle Deathmatch by ZenixSin Reporter: maxim_yeet2 (Roblox ID: 2992225816) Discord ID: 1267550821185491085 Offender: ZenixSin Incident: Vehicle Deathmatch (VDM) Evidence: Medal Clip Decision: ❌ Invalid Report – Insufficient Evidence Upon reviewing the submitted clip, the evidence does not conclusively demonstrate intentional Vehicle Deathmatch (VDM) by the accused player, ZenixSin. The clip shows a collision; however, it lacks clear indicators of malicious intent or repeated offenses that would typically characterize VDM. Rules Considered: [2.3] Vehicle Deathmatch (VDM): Using a vehicle to intentionally hit or kill other players without valid roleplay reason. While the collision is unfortunate, it appears to be accidental or due to in-game physics rather than a deliberate act of VDM. Outcome: No disciplinary action will be taken against ZenixSin at this time. If further evidence or repeated incidents occur, please submit a new report with additional details. Note: For future reports, please ensure that the evidence clearly shows intentional misconduct to facilitate appropriate action. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  15. Report Review: GlitterSparkles11177 Reporter: Barcelori (Roblox ID: 1804102180) Discord ID: 687382194821529614 Offender: GlitterSparkles11177 Incident: Random Deathmatch (RDM) Evidence: Medal Clip Decision: ❌ Valid Report – 2-Day Ban Issued After reviewing the submitted clip, the offender GlitterSparkles11177 was observed shooting and killing the reporter without any prior roleplay engagement or valid RP initiation. There was no verbal engagement, prior scene, or visible threat from the reporting party that would warrant deadly force. Rules Violated: [2.2] Player versus Player (PvP) – Random Deathmatch (RDM): Attacking or killing another player without proper roleplay initiation or valid cause. This behavior is considered a serious disruption to roleplay standards and impacts the experience of other players on the server. Outcome: A 2-day ban has been issued to GlitterSparkles11177 for the violation. Repeat offenses will result in escalated disciplinary action. Ban Reason (for record): Random Deathmatch (RDM) – Killed another player without valid RP reason or interaction. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  16. Report Review: nico152016 Reporter: cubelikes234 (Roblox ID: 904895804) Discord ID: 809845816394645572 Offender: nico152016 Discord Username: sweat08 Incident: FailRP, Random Deathmatch (RDM) Evidence: Medal Clip Decision: ✅ Valid Report – 2-Day Ban Issued Upon reviewing the provided evidence, the following violations of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines were identified: Fail Roleplay (FailRP): The offender opened a locked vehicle door and initiated an attack without any prior roleplay or escalation, which is unrealistic and breaks immersion. Random Deathmatch (RDM): The offender discharged a firearm at a player without valid in-character justification or initiation, violating PvP rules. These actions are in direct violation of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines, specifically: [2.5] Roleplay Rules – Fail Roleplay (FailRP) [2.2] Player versus Player (PvP) – Random Deathmatch (RDM)Mountain Interactive Outcome: A 2-day ban has been issued to nico152016 for the aforementioned violations. Continued disregard for community guidelines may result in more severe penalties, including permanent suspension. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Maintaining a respectful and immersive roleplay environment is a top priority. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  17. VerifiedDavid replied to Lexitealt's topic in Completed
    Hello, User is already banned. Thank you.
  18. Report Review: SASoperator0 & Vl0NE99 Reporter: thoands (Roblox: SASoperator0) Incident: FailRP, Tool Abuse, RDM, and Inappropriate Language Evidence: Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Clip 4 Clip 5Mountain Interactive Decision: ✅ Valid Report – 1 Week Ban Issued After a thorough review of the provided evidence, the following violations of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines were identified: Fail Roleplay (FailRP): The offender engaged in unrealistic behavior during a traffic stop, including resisting arrest and attempting to steal vehicles while in custody. Tool Abuse: The offender misused in-game tools by cuffing officers without proper roleplay context, disrupting the flow of the scenario. Random Deathmatch (RDM): The offender initiated unprovoked attacks on law enforcement officers without valid in-character justification. Inappropriate Language: The offender used offensive language during the interaction, violating the community's standards for respectful communication. These actions are in direct violation of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines, specifically: [2.5] Roleplay Rules – Fail Roleplay (FailRP) [3] Chat & Voice Rules – Inappropriate Language [4.1] Criminal Rules – Random Deathmatch (RDM) [4.2] Tool Abuse Outcome: A 2-day ban has been issued to SASoperator0 for the aforementioned violations. Continued disregard for community guidelines may result in more severe penalties, including permanent suspension. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Maintaining a respectful and immersive roleplay environment is a top priority. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  19. Report Review: eidirjriejddj Reporter: cubelikes234 (Roblox ID: 904895804) Discord ID: 809845816394645572 Offender: eidirjriejddj Incident: RDM, FailRP, Scene Interference, Abuse of Tools Evidence: Medal ClipMountain Interactive Decision: ✅ Valid Report – Perm Ban Issued. After reviewing the submitted evidence and considering the context provided, the following violations of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines were identified: Random Deathmatch (RDM): The offender discharged a firearm at the reporter without any valid roleplay initiation or justification, violating [2.2] Player versus Player (PvP) rules. Fail Roleplay (FailRP): The actions demonstrated a lack of adherence to realistic roleplay standards, including the improper escalation of force, as outlined in [2.5] Fail Roleplay (FailRP). Scene Interference (SI): The offender intervened in an active roleplay scene without a valid in-character reason, disrupting ongoing roleplay activities, contrary to [0] Terminology & Key Concepts.Mountain Interactive Abuse of Tools (AoT): The misuse of in-game mechanics, such as forcibly opening locked vehicle doors without proper roleplay context, constitutes tool abuse. Outcome: A 2-day ban has been issued to eidirjriejddj for the aforementioned violations. Continued disregard for community guidelines may result in more severe penalties, including permanent suspension. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Maintaining a respectful and immersive roleplay environment is a top priority. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  20. Report Review: shrekpoop6666 Reporter: Runscape45 (Roblox) Discord ID: 1205294340965007420 Offender: shrekpoop6666 (Roblox) Incident: RDM ×3, FailRP, Targeting LEOs Evidence: Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Decision: ✅ Valid Report – 3-Day Ban Issued After reviewing the submitted evidence, the following violations were identified: Random Deathmatch (RDM): The offender engaged in multiple unprovoked attacks against law enforcement officers without valid in-character justification.Mountain Interactive Fail Roleplay (FailRP): The actions displayed a clear disregard for established roleplay norms, including unrealistic behavior and lack of character development. Targeting Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs): The offender persistently targeted LEOs, undermining the integrity of roleplay scenarios and disrupting the immersive experience for other players. These actions are in direct violation of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines, specifically: [2.2] Roleplay Rules – Player versus Player (PvP): Valid Kills [2.5] Roleplay Rules – Fail Roleplay (FailRP)Mountain Interactive+1Disclaimer | SADRP Rules+1 Outcome: A 3-day ban has been issued to shrekpoop6666 for the aforementioned violations. Continued disregard for community guidelines may result in more severe penalties, including permanent suspension. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Maintaining a respectful and immersive roleplay environment is a top priority. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  21. Invalid Report - Not following template
  22. Report Review: Razorbladelover1 (Roblox) / Kngrazor (Discord) Reporter: jxstgab Discord ID: 747641262487765013 Offender: Razorbladelover1 (Roblox) / Kngrazor (Discord) Incident: Tool Abuse, FailRP, Trolling Evidence: Medal Clip Decision: ✅ Valid Report – 1 Day Ban Issued After reviewing the provided evidence, the following violations were identified: Tool Abuse: The offender repeatedly used administrative tools (e.g., cuffing) inappropriately, disrupting the roleplay experience for other players. Fail Roleplay (FailRP): The offender failed to adhere to realistic roleplay standards, including misrepresenting their role within the in-game law enforcement hierarchy. Trolling: The offender engaged in behavior intended to provoke or disrupt other players, undermining the integrity of the roleplay environment. These actions are in direct violation of Mountain Interactive's community guidelines, specifically: [2.5] Roleplay Rules – Fail Roleplay (FailRP) [2.1] General – Realistic Behavior [3] Chat & Voice Rules – Stay In Character Outcome: A 1-day ban has been issued to Razorbladelover1 for the aforementioned violations. Continued disregard for community guidelines may result in more severe penalties. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Maintaining a respectful and immersive roleplay environment is a top priority. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team Community & Gameplay Rules [email protected]
  23. Report Review – Offender: Kendraj876 Reporter: Vortxle (Roblox ID: Unknown) Reported Violation: Color Change During Pursuit / FRP Evidence Reviewed: https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k7gkTqoV8giw_DXSG?invite=cr-MSw2b1IsMzg4MzY4OTY4 Decision: ✅ Valid Report – 1 Day Ban Issued After reviewing the submitted video, the player "Kendraj876" is seen changing their vehicle color while actively being pursued, which is a direct violation of: [Section 2.5] – Fail Roleplay (FRP): "Players may not change appearance, vehicles, or identifying attributes to avoid recognition during or after active scenes." [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust: Intentionally altering vehicle identity mid-pursuit shows awareness of being pursued and attempting to deceive law enforcement. There is no rule-justified reason to change color during a hot pursuit, and the footage clearly supports the claim of intentional rule-breaking. Outcome: Offender has been issued a 1-day ban for FRP Action is consistent with Mountain Interactive policy on scene manipulation Ban Reason to Add to Record: Changing vehicle color mid-pursuit to avoid recognition – [2.5] FRP Violation Thank you for the report. Future behavior of the user will be monitored, and repeat violations may result in longer suspensions. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]
  24. Report Review: Insufficient Information – Report Denied Thank you for submitting a report. However, we are unable to proceed with moderation action because the offender’s Roblox username was not provided. Our system requires a valid username to identify and review user records before any action can be taken. While the clip does show questionable behavior, we cannot confirm the identity of the player involved. For future reports, please ensure you include: Full Roblox username (not just display name) Offender’s Discord ID (if known) Any additional context or identifying info that can assist staff Final Decision: ❌ Report Denied – User Not Identified Please feel free to resubmit this report if you can retrieve the username of the offender. Thanks for helping us keep the community fair. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]