David

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Secret_Division (Roblox ID: 6098662173) Discord ID: 1307556129735184417 Ban Type: Past Ban Record Appeal (Not currently banned) Ban in Question: Ban ID [67130] – 3 Days Ban Reason: RDM x2, SI x2, PB Staff Member: ⭐Cookie Evidence Reviewed: Video 1 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvCSfMQ0atc Video 2 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlw6kmcbco Ban record, warnings, and all attached moderation notes Summary of Appeal: The user is not currently banned but is requesting the removal of a prior 3-day ban from March 2, 2025. They claim they have reflected on their past behavior, and they would like to clear their record in order to pursue further opportunities within the community. They do not deny the actions but believe they have changed since then. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Record Will Remain After full review of the evidence and moderation history: Ban ID 67130 is fully supported by video evidence showing two unprovoked kills, interference with staff in an active scene, and abusive conduct while in a position of authority. These are direct violations of: [Section 2.2] – Random Deathmatch [Section 2.3] – Escalation [Section 5.0] – Staff Interference [Section 4.3] – Power-Based RP This was not an isolated incident. The user has a pattern of repeated issues involving: [Ban ID 60190] – Team Abuse [Kick ID 4471] – GTA-D Role Abuse Warnings for: RDM, FRP, IWFD (emergency role misuse) Evidence from previous incidents (e.g., https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jbWQctXl4np4Uaq1H, https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k1diw8TrFClrhZ4sL) consistently shows unrealistic, escalated, or abusive roleplay behavior over time. Due to the number of documented incidents and confirmed rule violations, this record must remain on file. Appeal approval would compromise staff visibility into repeat offenses. Outcome: The ban record will not be removed No additional enforcement is being taken The user remains eligible to participate in the community but is on watch for any further violations Continued clean behavior over time may support future role applications or record reevaluation We encourage the user to stay committed to their improvement and to lead by example if aiming for future trust and responsibility. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: XxTheVibezEpic (Roblox ID: 2248906394) Discord ID: 846703502460715028 (spixzz) Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: BH (Body Humping) Staff Member: polski.huligan Evidence Reviewed: YouTube Clip – https://youtu.be/o-0_YrIPk0o Summary of Appeal: The user admits to participating in body humping during a session on a small server while joking around with a friend. They claim they were unaware it was against the rules at the time. After the ban, the user states they reviewed the rules and now understands why it was inappropriate. They express remorse and ask for a second chance, emphasizing that they want to contribute positively to the community going forward. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Warning Noted After reviewing the video evidence and the user’s moderation history: The behavior in the video clearly violates Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only, as body humping is considered inappropriate and disruptive. However, the user has no prior warnings or bans before this incident, and the behavior appears to have been isolated and not malicious in nature. The tone of the appeal is respectful, and the user demonstrates a genuine willingness to improve and follow the rules. Outcome: Ban has already expired; no further action needed. A formal note will remain on file for reference. Any future similar behavior will result in a longer suspension or permanent action. This is a reminder that even in smaller or less populated sessions, community standards and conduct rules still apply. All users are expected to maintain respectful roleplay behavior regardless of server size or activity. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Alia9055 (Roblox ID: 1522073716) Discord ID: 834081664766181437 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: FRP (Fail Roleplay) – Unlawful vehicle interaction during active scene Staff Member: MysticMeadow23 Evidence Reviewed: Video – https://youtu.be/_bPUapDmkF0 Moderation History: 2 Prior Bans (RDM, FRP) 2 Prior Warnings (RDM, FRP) Multiple notes confirming ongoing borderline behavior and a prior accepted appeal Summary of AppealThe user denies opening the vehicle trunk but admits to roleplaying “licking” it. They argue that trunk interaction isn't FRP because CHP vehicles wouldn't auto-lock at low speeds, and no roleplay to lock the car was issued. The user further claims another player was repeatedly interacting with the trunk, and that the ban may have mistaken their roleplay action for an actual game-triggered one. They also argue that the officer shouting “I’m reporting for FRP” mid-scene was also breaking RP. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Pattern of FRP ConfirmedAfter reviewing the video: The scene shows a group engaging in unrealistic behavior at a police stop. Whether or not the user directly opened the trunk, the roleplay action of “licking a trooper’s trunk” in a chaotic scene is not only non-serious, but deliberately disruptive to the RP environment. The appeal attempts to justify the behavior using real-life logic and claims of misidentification — however, this exact type of behavior is already documented in their prior FRP warning and FRP ban, making this part of a clear pattern. Additional concern: The user includes an admission that they “shot” the trooper later in the scene. While not the main reason for this specific ban, it supports the evidence of non-compliant RP behavior and further undermines the appeal’s credibility. This directly violates: [Section 2.1 – General RP Rules (Unrealistic Behavior)] [Section 2.3 – Situational Escalation] [Section 1.5 – Common Sense & Community Conduct] Outcome:Ban remains active and will expire automatically No action will be taken to shorten or reverse the penalty This serves as a final warning: future FRP or disruptive behavior will result in longer bans or full removal from the community User is encouraged to re-review the Community Rules and roleplay standards before rejoining Mountain Interactive expects all players to maintain immersion and treat law enforcement roleplay with respect. Disruptive antics—especially after prior warnings—will be met with escalating enforcement. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Alia9055 (Roblox ID: 1522073716) Discord ID: 834081664766181437 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 day) Ban Reason: FRP (Fail Roleplay) – Unlawful vehicle interaction during RP scene Staff Member: MysticMeadow23 Evidence Reviewed: Video Evidence – https://youtu.be/_bPUapDmkF0 Ban Record: 2 Prior Bans (RDM, FRP) 2 Prior Warnings (RDM, FRP) Multiple internal notes tied to repeat behavior and previous appeals Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were falsely blamed for opening a trooper’s trunk and argues that the action wasn’t FRP, stating IRL you could open a trunk under certain conditions. They also say another person was repeatedly opening the trunk and that they merely roleplayed “licking” the trunk. They believe the ban is based on a misunderstanding and point to multiple people being present at the scene. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Pattern of FRP Confirmed Upon review of the full video evidence and moderation history: The clip shows clear and intentional interaction with the vehicle (repeated activation of the trunk during an RP scene with law enforcement), without RP context or justification. The "licking the trunk" comment, even if not the direct cause of the interaction, contributes to a scene that escalated into unrealistic and disruptive roleplay. Prior moderation history includes multiple FRP-related warnings and a previous ban — this is a continued pattern of pushing unrealistic behavior in serious roleplay scenarios. Regarding the user’s defense: Real-life justifications (e.g., “you could do this IRL”) do not override community standards. Vehicles are assumed locked unless otherwise roleplayed. The lack of a /me or /do does not justify forcing interaction with government vehicles during scenes. The claim that others were also doing it does not absolve the user of responsibility. Outcome: Ban will remain active and expire as scheduled No further action will be taken at this time, but this serves as a final notice: Any further FRP incidents will likely result in longer bans or permanent action The user is strongly advised to re-review Section 2.1 – General RP Rules and community conduct standards Repeat violations, especially after being given multiple chances, will not continue to be tolerated. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected] https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: GeraSheriff (Roblox ID: Not provided) Discord ID: Not provided Ban Type: Game Ban Ban Reason: RDM (Random Deathmatch) Staff Member: Reported under Ban ID: 70092 – Logged by @CoolkrasLost Evidence Reviewed: Medal Clip – https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k6HqTL6EHUGO25NXG?invite=cr-MSxEekUsMjI0NDI4MjIw Summary of Appeal: The user claims they encountered another player (referred to as "AMR girl") at the gun store, exchanged a few words, then shot them after believing they were preparing for conflict. The user believes they had a valid RP reason to engage, stating that the target made a radio call and said something that sounded like a threat. They also criticize the admin who issued the ban, stating they were not allowed to fully explain and that the admin dismissed their defense without proper review. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – RDM Confirmed After reviewing the full video: The clip shows the user approaching a player, initiating minor conversation, and then opening fire. The other player makes no verbal or physical threat, nor is there any weapon drawn or hostile behavior. A radio call is made, but without any hostile words or action from the other party. The kill appears entirely one-sided, with no clear RP escalation, no direct threat, and no proper justification for lethal force. This falls under a clear violation of Section 2.2 – Random Deathmatch (RDM), which requires valid RP reason and clear escalation before engaging in combat. Additionally, the behavior toward staff in the appeal is dismissive and implies misuse of authority, yet no misconduct by staff was identified in the logs. Staff are required to make quick decisions during scene reviews, and evidence supports their judgment here. Outcome: The ban will remain in place. The user may submit a new appeal after 7 days, provided it includes: A respectful tone and complete understanding of the rule broken A statement on how escalation works and when shooting is appropriate Attempts to blame staff or misrepresent facts without evidence will not help future appeals Mountain Interactive is built on realistic, fair, and immersive roleplay. Situations like this — shooting without threat — harm the experience for others and will always be handled seriously. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Nicrox_x (Roblox ID: 4468383405) Discord ID: 1155108167701778523 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: MRDM (Mass Random Deathmatch), SI (Staff Interference) Staff Member: Logged under Ban ID 69194 Evidence Reviewed: Screenshot evidence: https://imgur.com/a/repost-evidence-Xalg54H Internal ban record: Ban ID 69194 Summary of Appeal: The user explains that they came across a police scene where their friend was being arrested and, in an attempt to intervene, opened fire on four officers. They acknowledge this resulted in a ban for MRDM and SI. In their appeal, the user expresses regret and states they have now reviewed the rules, watched roleplay guides, and better understand how their actions broke RP. They request a second chance, stating they understand the mistake and would not repeat it. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – MRDM and SI Confirmed The provided evidence shows the following: The user approached a routine arrest scene, where law enforcement was actively processing a civilian. Without any RP initiation, escalation, or communication, the user opened fire and killed four officers in rapid succession. One of the victims was a staff member actively handling the scene, making this not only Mass RDM but also Staff Interference. No coordination, group planning, or RP justification was presented before or after the action. This directly violates: [Section 2.2 – Random Deathmatch (RDM)] [Section 2.3 – Escalation Rules] [Section 2.3.1 – Mass RDM (MRDM)] [Section 5.0 – Staff Scene Interference (SI)] While we recognize the user has reflected and shown effort to improve, the seriousness of these violations — especially in a public scene involving a staff-led arrest — makes reinstatement at this time inappropriate. Outcome: The permanent ban remains active User may appeal again in 30 days, but must include: A detailed acknowledgment of each rule violated A realistic plan for avoiding future misconduct Agreement to avoid all forms of alt account usage during the waiting period Any evasion or misuse of alternate accounts will result in permanent appeal revocation. We appreciate the respectful tone of the appeal and encourage continued rule study. Future chances depend on demonstrated growth and transparency. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: kustimustikas123 (Roblox ID: 3922320359) Discord ID: 1234513274339459213 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Los Angeles) Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service / inappropriate content) Staff Member: oogabooga116 Evidence Reviewed: Medal Clip – https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k6IzRAMTBnRD6UTmf?invite=cr-MSxGRnosMTkxMzY1NzI1 Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges making an inappropriate joke ("this rifle is longer than your pickle") and claims it was meant as humor, not disrespect. They explain they didn’t fully realize the implications of the comment at the time but now understand why it violated the rules. The appeal expresses sincere regret and emphasizes their intention to think before speaking in the future. They ask for a second chance and admit they’ve learned from the ban. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Final Chance Granted Upon reviewing the clip: The user makes a clearly inappropriate and sexually suggestive joke in a public VC context, which does violate Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only and could fall under V-TOS due to the community's younger audience. However, the behavior does not appear malicious or targeted, and the user immediately stops when corrected. The appeal is respectfully written, expresses clear understanding of the rule now, and shows a willingness to grow. We believe this situation warrants a second chance under final warning conditions. Any further violations of this nature will result in an irreversible community ban. Outcome: Ban lifted User returns under a final warning Any future violations involving NSFW jokes, suggestive remarks, or disrespectful content will result in a non-appealable permanent ban We appreciate your honesty. Please remember Mountain Interactive is a diverse and mixed-age community — always keep your conduct respectful and safe for everyone involved. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: roryj2012 (Roblox ID: 1139216781) Discord ID: 1324031419600867471 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Violation of TR (Training Regulations) Staff Member: Not listed Evidence Provided: Ban screenshot only – original video evidence is no longer accessible Summary of Appeal: The user states they were permanently banned approximately one year ago for violating TR (Training Regulations). They admit to being unaware at the time that their actions were against the rules but now fully take responsibility. They express guilt and a desire to return to the community, noting that they did not understand the rule they had broken but now acknowledge their mistake. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstatement Granted Given the following considerations: The ban is over one year old The user takes full responsibility and expresses remorse No evidence is currently available to dispute or further investigate the original violation The appeal is respectfully written and shows willingness to improve We are granting a second chance under probation terms. This reinstatement does not excuse the original offense, but reflects our belief in redemption and growth over time.

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Agent_wolf155 (Roblox ID: 5387774259) Discord ID: 1282789657649872958 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Los Angeles) Ban Reason: NLR, RDM, and V-NG abuse Staff Member: Haydz6 Evidence Provided: YouTube Clip – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awAFdzSrq_A Summary of Appeal: The user admits to violating multiple rules, including New Life Rule (NLR), Random Deathmatch (RDM), and improper use of National Guard vehicles (V-NG). They express repeated apologies and take responsibility for their actions. The appeal is centered on remorse and a promise to follow the rules moving forward, requesting a second chance and asking not to be permanently removed from the community. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Multiple Major Violations Confirmed After reviewing the full video evidence, the following violations were confirmed: RDM: The user exited a military vehicle and fatally shot another player without any form of RP interaction or escalation. NLR: The user was killed in combat, then returned to the same location and re-engaged shortly after respawning — violating the New Life Rule. V-NG Abuse: The user operated a military HEMTT vehicle without proper RP structure or coordination. The vehicle was used for solo patrols and engagement in civilian zones, which is prohibited under faction rules. These actions reflect a pattern of serious disruption to roleplay and public gameplay environments. The behavior captured in the video is not isolated or accidental, but rather sustained and intentional. Outcome: The permanent ban will remain in place. No new appeal will be accepted for 14 days from the date of this decision. Future appeals must demonstrate: Full acknowledgment of all rule violations A clear plan for improvement and conduct No further alt use or evasion attempts Alt account misuse will result in a full appeal lock and extended enforcement. We appreciate the honesty in your appeal, but due to the scale of disruption, a reinstatement is not possible at this time. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

No problem! We also agree

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: 2012jahhh (Roblox ID: Not provided) Discord ID: 1216436672187858984 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Los Angeles) Ban Reason: Cuff Rushing while on a One-Strike Warning Evidence Provided: [Video reviewed – "20250222194715956 (1).mp4"] Staff Member: Ban issued by Moderation Team Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges they were banned for cuff rushing while already under a one-strike warning. They express regret and apologize, stating they have reviewed the rules and now understand the seriousness of the violation. The appeal requests a second chance and assures the user’s intent to follow all server rules going forward. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Final Chance Granted After reviewing the video and context: The cuff rushing incident is confirmed in the footage, which clearly shows an attempt to arrest without proper RP escalation. However, the user takes full responsibility for their actions and submitted a respectful, well-written appeal. The tone of the message reflects genuine understanding and remorse, and the acknowledgment of prior warnings adds credibility to their intent to improve. As a result, we are issuing a one-time reinstatement under strict conditions. Outcome: Ban lifted, effective immediately One-Strike Policy reinstated – any future serious rule violation will result in a non-appealable permanent ban User is expected to re-read and comply fully with Mountain Interactive’s Rules We appreciate your honesty and willingness to take accountability. You’ve been given a second chance — use it wisely. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected] https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionMOUNTAIN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT TERMINATIONAppealing User: malak (Roblox Username: Ph0nkyT0wn | Roblox ID: 1877968346) Discord ID: 1296963078767902721 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Perris) Ban Reason: Creating or using an account to avoid enforcement Staff Member: Automated System Detection Evidence Provided: Internal moderation logs, system flags, user ban history Summary of Appeal: The user states they were away from their device when the ban occurred and denies any intent to avoid prior enforcement actions. They claim they were previously playing without issue and do not recall violating any rules. The appeal requests a second chance, expressing enjoyment of the game and a desire not to negatively impact others' experiences. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Ban Evasion Confirmed After reviewing the automated logs and ban history: The account Ph0nkyT0wn was flagged and permanently banned after being linked to a previously banned account that was removed for exploiting. Shortly after the original ban, this new account was created and used to rejoin the game — a clear violation of Section 2.5 – Alt Account Use and Ban Evasion. Whether intentional or not, the use of an alternate account following a permanent enforcement action is a strict breach of our policies. We appreciate the tone of the appeal, but unfortunately, alt account creation after a permanent ban results in a non-appealable status unless approved through a full staff override — which does not apply in this case. Outcome: The permanent ban will remain in place. The original exploit-related ban still stands. No further appeals will be accepted unless new information is provided under the original banned identity. For transparency, this action and all related enforcement will remain recorded in our moderation logs. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionMOUNTAIN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT TERMINATION NOTICEAppealing User: AKAWICKED2 (Roblox ID: 5131815665) Discord ID: Not explicitly listed, but matches AKAWICKED2 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Game and Discord) Ban Reason: Use of racial slurs & inappropriate content, staff deception, alt account misuse Evidence Provided: Screenshots of AutoMod log, direct messages with staff, user statements Summary of Appeal: The user indirectly appealed their ban by attempting to regain access to their in-game ranks and roles. They claimed to have lost their account due to phone verification and requested a transfer to a new account. However, shortly after, they admitted they might be able to get the original account back, revealing the account was not actually lost. Additionally, the original account was flagged by AutoMod for using an extremely inappropriate message involving racial slurs and sexual content in a public Discord channel. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Multiple Rule Violations Confirmed After a full review of the evidence, the ban on the original account AKAWICKED2 is valid and will remain in place. The violations are as follows: Section 1.1 – No Racism or Hate Speech: The user used a racial slur in a public message, which is an automatic permanent ban under community policy. Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only: The full content of the message included vulgar and inappropriate references. Section 1.6 – Lying to Staff: The user falsely claimed their account was lost, while privately admitting they may be able to get it back, indicating an attempt to mislead moderation staff. Section 2.5 – Alt Account Use: Attempted to bypass a Discord timeout and access role recovery through deceptive means. These actions show a clear intent to deceive and a disregard for community standards. Outcome: Permanent ban remains active. No eligibility for appeal unless a detailed acknowledgment of the violations is submitted by the user under their original identity. We take the integrity and safety of our community seriously. Attempts to circumvent bans or manipulate staff undermine that environment and will not be tolerated. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

APPEAL DENIEDYou were found in a exploiter server.

IN REVIEW BY OUR TEAM

Report Declined - No Clips read how to make a report bozo

Report Declined - Clips do not work.

Report Declined - Clips do not work.

Report Review DecisionSEVERE - OFFENDER'S ACCOUNT TERMINATEDReporter: Littlegrasshopper (Roblox: 28878367 | Discord: 28878367) Accused: Shun_1220924 (Roblox: Shun_1220924) Incident Summary: The player is reported for making potentially NSFW comments during roleplay and then leaving the game while being arrested. Rules Allegedly Violated: Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only Section 2.5 – Leave to Avoid Roleplay (LTAR) Evidence Provided: Medal Clip Final Decision: Rule Violations Confirmed – LTAR + Inappropriate Language Upon reviewing the video: NSFW/Disrespectful Content: The accused is heard making sexually suggestive remarks ("I like my girl to be 15") in the presence of officers and other players. These comments are clearly inappropriate and violate Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only, which prohibits any form of NSFW or sexual language within the game environment. Leave to Avoid Arrest: Immediately after being handcuffed and detained, the accused leaves the game, clearly mid-arrest with no indication of a crash or disconnect. This meets the criteria for Leave to Avoid Roleplay (LTAR). Both actions are clear and recorded in the clip. The language used is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in any context, comedic or otherwise, especially within a public community server. Outcome: Shun_1220924 will receive a moderation penalty for both LTAR and inappropriate content. Due to the serious nature of the remarks, the account may be subject to an elevated ban duration. Thank you for taking the time to report this and helping maintain a respectful and safe roleplay environment. We encourage all users to immediately report behavior like this with recorded evidence. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Report Review DecisionReporter: Barcelori (Roblox: 1804102180 | Discord: 1804102180) Accused: Greg_9128 (Roblox: Greg_9128) Incident Summary: Player allegedly interfered with a police scene while wielding an airsoft gun, was arrested after multiple warnings, and left the game while en route to the station to avoid detainment. Rules Allegedly Violated: Section 2.5 – Leave to Avoid Roleplay (LTAR) Evidence Provided: Medal Clip Final Decision: LTAR Confirmed – Action Taken After reviewing the provided clip, the following was observed: The accused, Greg_9128, is shown being escorted by officers in custody following multiple warnings to back off during an active scene. During transport to the police station, the player leaves the game abruptly, clearly before the roleplay is concluded. The exit happens at a critical moment in the RP chain (mid-transport), with no attempt to finish or excuse their departure in-character. This is a clear violation of [Section 2.5 – Leaving to Avoid Roleplay (LTAR)], which prohibits players from exiting the game to escape arrest or consequences during ongoing roleplay. The rule exists to ensure fairness and proper RP resolution for all involved parties. Outcome: Greg_9128 will receive a moderation penalty for LTAR. This typically results in a temporary ban, and further offenses may lead to stricter consequences. If the user has a valid reason for their disconnection (e.g., crash, emergency), they may submit a counter-report with proof of disconnection within 24 hours for review. We appreciate your detailed report and evidence submission. You’ve helped maintain a fair and immersive RP environment for everyone involved. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Report Review DecisionReporter: CaptainIIFergie (Roblox: 1440559111 | Discord: 1209230216551997544) Accused: Todtii55544 (Roblox: Todtii55544) Incident Summary: You reported that while performing body cleanup at S&K, you were shot without warning or interaction. Rules Allegedly Violated: Section 2.2.1 – Random Deathmatch (RDM) Evidence Provided: Medal Clip Final Decision: RDM Confirmed – Action Taken After reviewing the footage, it is clear that the kill was unprovoked and lacked any proper roleplay escalation or threat. At the time of the shooting, you were unarmed and performing a body cleanup action. The accused fired without any form of initiation or visible reason, which directly violates [Section 2.2.1 – RDM]. Outcome: A moderation action has been taken against Todtii55544. Severity of the action depends on prior history but may include a warning or temporary ban. We appreciate you taking the time to submit a report. Remember to always record when possible, as clear video evidence like this makes it easier for us to enforce the rules and keep the experience fair for everyone. If you have further concerns or questions, you can reach us at [email protected]. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Report Review Decision Reporter: 4ltros (Roblox: 619090219 | Discord: 981209449245061170) Accused: Caeltus (Roblox: Caeltus | Discord: acaez#1301558671708393517) Incident Summary: Alleged RDM during a National Guard convoy roleplay operation Evidence Provided: Streamable Video | Discord Kill Logs Final Decision: No action taken After a thorough review of the submitted report and available evidence, including the video provided and both parties’ statements, we are unable to confirm a violation of our rules—specifically Section 2.2.1: Random Deathmatch (RDM). The recording begins after the incident took place and does not capture the key events leading up to the kills. As a result, we cannot verify whether the deaths occurred without valid escalation or roleplay context. Additionally, the accused (Caeltus) provided a counter-explanation indicating: An observed unauthorized convoy being conducted outside base without proper permissions A verbal altercation initiated by the reporter that included insults (e.g., “brain dead”) A surrender action post-incident, suggesting continued roleplay While the lack of permission for convoys is not grounds for immediate PvP engagement without RP escalation, the information from both parties suggests there may have been a roleplay context that was not captured in the video. Additional Notes: As of the current policies outlined under Military Roleplay Rules, convoys require Corporate+ approval. This requirement applies going forward, regardless of past precedent. Please ensure proper authorization is obtained for any future deployments or off-base operations. Insulting other players (e.g., calling someone “brain dead”) is a violation of our Community Conduct Expectations. This behavior is not acceptable, even in the heat of an argument. A verbal warning will be issued for this. Outcome: Caeltus: No punishment issued; incident considered escalated RP 4ltros: Verbal warning issued for inappropriate language/insults during roleplay We encourage both parties to review our full Rules & Guidelines and exercise respectful roleplay conduct moving forward. If either side has additional video footage showing the incident in full, they may submit a follow-up appeal or counter-report. Thank you for your report. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com [email protected] Report Declined

REPORT ACCEPTEDUser has been moderated. Thank you for your report.

REJECTEDTemplate not followed correctly.

Report AcceptedThe user has been moderated. Thank you for your report.