David

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: fdf_gdj2 (Roblox ID: 2623738108) Discord ID: 1306020210129633290 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Underaged Staff Member: <@951891043819851806> Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 55195 – Underaged Screenshot Evidence: https://ibb.co/jTGVW9z, https://ibb.co/7Kmh1Qb Moderation History: 1 permanent ban (underage statement) No prior warnings, kicks, or notes beyond the original enforcement Summary of Appeal: The user states this incident occurred back in 2023 and claims that they were banned due to a typo while confirming their age to someone. They originally typed “11” but then corrected themselves in the same conversation, stating they were 17. They now claim the ban was a misunderstanding and are requesting to be unbanned due to the false interpretation of their message. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Correction Valid After reviewing the screenshots and appeal: The original ban was enforced under [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance, which includes the enforcement of Roblox's Terms of Use. At the time, staff interpreted the user’s message as a self-admission of being underage, which triggered an immediate permanent ban to ensure compliance. However, the user corrected the age within the same exchange. No additional violations or platform safety concerns have followed since then. The correction appears genuine and consistent with the user’s current age and account behavior. Outcome: Ban lifted The user is expected to avoid all age-related discussion moving forward Any future behavior involving age misrepresentation, unsafe conduct, or violation of platform integrity will result in immediate and permanent removal without appeal. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Appeal rejected, please follow the format correctly.

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: WhereRose (Roblox ID: 650512290) Discord ID: 736073421225721906 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (3 Days) Ban Reason: FRP, NITRP, SI, LTAA Staff Member: q_Sxmply Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70212 – Evidence Clip Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were simply driving while in first-person and were unexpectedly shot at by law enforcement. In response, they state they panicked and attempted to flee, circled back without the intent to harm, and eventually left the game due to IRL reasons. The user disputes each charge individually and argues that some rule categories are outdated or not applicable to their case. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Violations Substantiated After thoroughly reviewing the video and context: 1. [Section 2.2] – FailRP / Unrealistic BehaviorThe user repeatedly circles back into an active, armed officer-involved shooting scene while driving erratically and nearly colliding with units. While first-person driving is not inherently FRP, using it as justification for reckless and immersion-breaking driving behavior—especially after gunfire had already been exchanged—does not excuse or override the realism standards expected. 2. [Section 5.1] – Scene Interference (SI)The claim that the user “became” part of the scene due to being shot at is not supported by the footage. The user is seen intentionally returning to the area twice, while police are clearly still engaging in active RP. Entering or re-entering an armed scene without a valid RP reason is explicitly prohibited, and this behavior meets the standard for Scene Interference. 3. [Section 2.1] – Not In The Roleplay (NITRP)While recent moderation messaging has suggested softening the use of "NITRP" as a standalone label, the actions here reflect behavior defined by the core of the term: non-serious, disruptive behavior with no meaningful contribution to the RP scene. Driving into an active shootout with no valid RP lead-up, then leaving mid-scene without notifying staff, supports the application of NITRP under the general expectation of meaningful RP contribution. 4. [Section 2.5] – LTAA (Leave to Avoid Arrest)The user disconnects immediately after fleeing from officers and making a final stop in the middle of the road. Whether the officer had lights activated at that exact second is irrelevant; the entire context—including being pursued in a prior gunfire situation—makes it clear that this was not a clean or safe point to exit the game. Disconnecting while law enforcement is preparing to initiate detainment falls within the scope of LTAA. Outcome: The 3-day ban is valid and will remain in place The user is expected to re-review the following rules before returning: Section 2.1 – NITRP [Section 2.2 – FailRP / PvP Behavior] [Section 2.5 – LTAA] [Section 5.1 – Scene Interference] The staff team appreciates the thoughtfulness of the appeal, but the video evidence and behavior pattern do not support a reversal of this action. — Reviewed and posted by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Greg_9128 (Roblox ID: 7724937287) Discord ID: 1357272200457093201 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: RTAA (Reset to Avoid Arrest) Staff Member: o_hhx Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70114 – RTAA Previous Ban ID 70045 – LTAA Warning issued for FRP (clip) Moderation History: 2 recent bans (LTAA and RTAA within 24 hours) 1 active warning (FailRP) Summary of Appeal: The user claims their brother was using their PC at the time of the RTAA violation and is asking to be unbanned. No further explanation is provided, and there is no acknowledgment of the prior LTAA or the related FRP warning issued just before the ban. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Behavior Pattern Confirmed After reviewing the evidence: The clip clearly shows the user resetting during the arrest booking process in an active RP situation, violating: [Section 2.5] – Resetting/Leaving to Avoid Arrest [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust This comes less than 24 hours after a separate LTAA ban for leaving during a previous arrest scenario. A recent FRP warning was also issued immediately prior to both incidents, establishing a consistent pattern of disrupting RP and avoiding consequences. The explanation of “my brother was on my PC” offers no verifiable proof and is a commonly used excuse in ban evasion and appeal scenarios. It does not override the repeated nature of the behavior captured in logs and video. Outcome: Ban will remain in place and expire automatically after 24 hours User is advised to review community rules carefully, particularly regarding arrest scenarios Any further attempts to avoid RP consequences through resets, disconnects, or excuses may result in longer suspensions or escalation to permanent action The staff team expects full participation in scenes and respect for both players and the roleplay environment. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: hotpocket7000 (Roblox ID: 571104917) Discord ID: 1032435193497255946 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS | Attempting to Bypass Staff Member: Daniel Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID [70124] Staff Log – Discord Prior Warning (RDM) – Clip Moderation History: 1 Warning (RDM – April 15, 2025) 1 Permanent Ban (V-TOS – April 18, 2025) Summary of Appeal: The user admits confusion over the exact cause of the V-TOS violation but expresses a strong desire to return and improve. They highlight that any action taken was done without malice and note their deep appreciation for the community, especially in faction-based RP. The appeal is respectful, self-aware, and focused on growth and future conduct. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Conditions After reviewing the full history and context: The “V-TOS | Attempting to Bypass” ban stemmed from behavior determined to be in violation of Mountain Interactive’s communication and integrity standards — including filtered terms or inappropriate phrasing used in ways that attempted to intentionally circumvent rules or moderation systems. This is a direct violation of: [Section 1.1] – Respectful Content Only [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust The user’s appeal acknowledges the need for greater awareness and takes full responsibility for misunderstanding the impact of their behavior. This is the user’s first major offense, and their tone, remorse, and proactive communication warrant a second chance. Outcome: Ban lifted A formal note is added to the account to track V-TOS involvement User is expected to comply strictly with all communication and RP standards Any future V-TOS violation or rule bypass attempt will result in immediate permanent removal Your appeal shows maturity and honesty. You’re being reinstated with the expectation that you will now uphold the rules you previously violated. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Officer_eevilbb12 (Roblox ID: 726568824) Discord ID: 1163856092632203384 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Administrator’s Discretion (Harassment, Unprofessional Conduct in DMs) Staff Member: Victor Evidence Reviewed: Appeal statements and user-provided clarification Internal staff chat logs regarding incident No warnings or prior bans on file Summary of Appeal: The user was permanently banned on December 30, 2024, for hostile and unprofessional behavior directed toward fellow community members and staff, in response to internal LAPD decisions. The appeal admits that they bypassed proper channels and took the matter into private messages where inappropriate language and personal attacks occurred. The user acknowledges their actions created a hostile environment and accepts full responsibility for the outcome. In a later clarification, they also distanced themselves from the individual whose firing initially triggered their reaction, explicitly denouncing his later actions. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Formal Warning After reviewing the full appeal and context: The user acknowledges their wrongdoing, takes full responsibility, and expresses remorse without deflecting blame. They do not minimize the impact of their behavior, instead offering detailed reflection and insight into why it was wrong. The clarification provided shows a deliberate step away from any association with related disruptive actors and confirms they are not part of ongoing drama or off-platform misconduct. This is the user's first and only disciplinary action on record, with no prior warnings or bans. The ban was justified at the time due to the tone, approach, and environment created — but the reflection and growth since then merit reinstatement. Outcome: Ban lifted A formal warning will be added to the user’s record Any future conduct involving personal harassment, staff disruption, or bypassing moderation channels will result in immediate permanent removal without further appeal Mountain Interactive values accountability, and this appeal demonstrates it. You are being given a second chance — use it to help build a better community for everyone. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: MagicJeety (Roblox ID: 514607406) Discord ID: 1163856092632203384 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Account + Game Ban) Ban Reason: Requested ban due to repeated disrespect, swearing during appeal attempts, and harassment of staff Staff Member: David / Haydz Evidence Reviewed: Internal moderation records Ban ID [63611] Discord DM transcript between user and David Site appeal: https://mountaininteractive.com/topic/5428-this-is-only-for-david Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges being banned for spamming David’s inbox and admits to using inappropriate language in a prior appeal. They now express regret, apologize for how they handled the situation, and request another opportunity to return to the community respectfully. They followed through with submitting a formal appeal when requested, and provided consistent communication through Discord. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Monitoring After reviewing the full context: The original reason for the ban was not due to in-game exploitation or severe roleplay violation, but rather due to repeated disrespectful appeal behavior and DM spam, which was emotional and impulsive, not malicious. Since then, the user has been cooperative, shown maturity in tone, and acknowledged past actions without shifting blame. This appears to be a case of someone who acted out of frustration but is now seeking a genuine return. The user previously received a one-strike policy, which has now expired (Feb 13, 2025), and they have not attempted evasion or harassment since. Outcome: Ban lifted across all platforms A formal note remains on file referencing prior incidents User is expected to maintain respectful communication at all times moving forward Any future harassment, trolling, or disruptive behavior will result in immediate and non-appealable permanent removal You’ve been given another chance. Use it responsibly. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Flash056434 (Roblox ID: 2684394992) Discord ID: 1115012711269552168 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: EXP (Exploitation – Use of Infinite Yield) Staff Member: System (automated detection) Evidence Reviewed: Internal anti-cheat flag (EXP – Infinite Yield) Self-admission in ban appeal Community reports and confirmation via Discord server logs Prior moderation actions and warnings Donation Status: User previously donated and held a rank Summary of Appeal: The user admits to using exploits (specifically Infinite Yield) in a private server, acknowledging that they “did it knowing the risk.” They claim nervousness led them to initially lie when banned, but now express regret. The user requests a second chance, citing long-time community involvement and prior purchases in Mountain Interactive titles. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Exploitation Confirmed This appeal confirms: Direct admission to using a known exploit tool (Infinite Yield), which is a severe breach of Mountain Interactive’s Section 2.6 – Exploiting and External Tool Use The user states they were aware it was not allowed, yet chose to do it anyway. Attempted deception following the ban further compounds the issue. The anti-cheat system correctly detected and enforced the ban, and external review from a known exploitation group (Xeno) supports the claim. Additionally: A donation or prior purchase does not exempt any user from community enforcement or rule compliance. The user’s prior moderation history includes: RDM, Tool Abuse, RSI, SI, and a prior ban for V-PT — showing a pattern of disruptive behavior even before the exploitation event. Outcome: The permanent ban will remain in effect No further appeals will be reviewed for this user Community ranks or donor statuses are forfeited upon confirmed exploitation Mountain Interactive maintains zero tolerance for exploiters, regardless of donation status or private server context. Your actions directly undermine the integrity of the community and player experience. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Hello Mountain Interactive! We’ve just published an important update to the Mountain Interactive Community Rules — specifically focused on improving how we handle drama, leadership behavior, and internal department conflicts. 🔧 What’s New? We’ve added rules that cover: Abuse of rank or staff power Interdepartmental rivalries (e.g., LAPD vs. LASD drama) Passive-aggressive behavior or cliquing Staff acting emotionally or without evidence People treating RP ranks like real authority Gossip, vagueposting, and off-platform stirring These issues have been quietly causing tension and toxicity across teams — especially between department leaders, staff members, and long-time players. These new rules are here to reset expectations and prevent abuse moving forward. 💡 Why We Did This: We want Mountain Interactive to stay fun, fair, and collaborative. That means: No more weaponizing staff titles or RP ranks. No more internal drama dragging down progress. A clear chain of command for real issues — and clear lines between roleplay and real leadership. 📄 Read the Full Rules Update: 👉 mountaininteractive.com/rules These changes are effective immediately, and all departments and staff members are expected to follow them. Let’s keep this community strong and focused on what we’re building together. — Mountain Interactive Team

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Xyrakles (Roblox ID: 43666526) Discord ID: Not provided Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: RDM, SI (Staff Interference) Staff Member: dodeg5 Evidence Reviewed: Video – https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1251933307856224342/1362208791789310113/PJmmoLVyGU2OtYp-Ss2shw.mp4 Moderation History: 5 Prior Bans: RDM (x2), LTAA, FRP, Staff Interference 4 Warnings: Team Abuse, V-PT, LTAA, PD Multiple clips on record confirming repeat issues with conduct Summary of Appeal: The user is appealing a permanent ban issued for RDM and Staff Interference. They have not provided their own explanation on this appeal page but are attempting to have the permanent removal overturned despite a consistent and escalating record of prior violations. No defense was submitted in this specific instance. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Repeated Rule Violations Confirmed After reviewing the evidence and moderation history: The video shows the user engaging in combat without clear RP initiation, followed by disregard for staff instructions during an active moderation situation. This behavior confirms RDM and SI, consistent with the ban reason. The user's record includes 5 prior bans in less than four months, all involving major RP breaches: RDM (x2), LTAA, FRP, and prior Team Abuse Multiple warnings and video-confirmed notes show no signs of improvement or behavior correction. This pattern demonstrates no regard for roleplay standards, staff direction, or community rules. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in place No future appeals will be considered unless a significant amount of time has passed with a written acknowledgment of all previous violations and a detailed plan for reform Mountain Interactive cannot make exceptions for users with extensive rule breaking records who have been given multiple chances and failed to correct their behavior. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Mathiasersej234 (Roblox ID: 1554148254) Discord ID: 1340762868580225107 Ban Type: Previously Banned – Reinstatement Request Ban Reason: RDM, NITRP Staff Member: Unknown Evidence Reviewed: Clip 1 – https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/im0a3dQtlBfo2smKd/d1337ZmZaycC Clip 2 – https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/im0gIvOrJ5NhKhfj7/d1337XrGNltE Moderation History: 3 Kicks (V-PT, V-TOS, IWS) 1 Warning (PD) 1 Note referencing permanent ban and linked clips Summary of Appeal: The user says the incident occurred more than six months ago and that they no longer recall the specifics. They admit to poor conduct at the time and ask for a second chance, stating they’ve matured and no longer play for “kills” but for the roleplay experience. They express interest in returning and acknowledge past mistakes. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Warning Although the current record displays 0 active bans, the linked evidence and user statement confirm that a permanent ban was issued for RDM and NITRP, both of which are serious violations. The user has not attempted to hide or deny the incident. Enough time has passed (6+ months) to justify reconsideration. The appeal is honest, acknowledges wrongdoing, and shows intent to improve. Outcome: Reinstated A formal warning is placed for record-keeping Future RDM, trolling, or non-roleplay behavior will result in immediate escalation Welcome back — you’ve been given a second chance. Please review all community rules before participating again. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: amproboatsailer (Roblox ID: 2679317236) Discord ID: Not provided Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: LTAA (Leave to Avoid Arrest) Staff Member: PokiWeston Evidence Reviewed: Streamable Clip – https://streamable.com/6dwrxi Moderation History: [56731] – RSI, FRP, RDM (1 Day Ban – Sep 15, 2024) [14009] – LTAA Warning (Aug 23, 2024) [15600] – (F)RP Warning (Oct 8, 2024) [70025] – LTAA (This Ban – Apr 16, 2025) Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were not trying to avoid arrest but rather experienced a crash or disconnect. They do not deny being in an arrest situation at the time but argue it was not intentional and want the incident reversed from their record. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – LTAA Confirmed After reviewing the provided video: The user is visibly under arrest, standing in close proximity to law enforcement officers during an active detainment. Within seconds of officers issuing commands, the user disconnects mid-scene without any visible technical stutter or delay. There is no follow-up reconnection, message, or log indicating a legitimate crash. The behavior fits the standard for Section 2.5 – Leave to Avoid Roleplay (LTAR / LTAA), where a player exits the server during or immediately before arrest or detainment. Additionally: The user has a prior LTAA warning, making this a repeat offense. The previous ban also included FRP and RDM, further reinforcing a history of RP interruptions and scene avoidance. Outcome: The ban will remain valid on record No changes or removals will be made to this enforcement Any further LTAA behavior will result in a longer suspension or escalation to permanent removal if repeated again We encourage players to always remain in the server until scenes are fully resolved. If a disconnect is legitimate, it is expected that players contact staff as soon as possible or reconnect to continue the roleplay. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: JALDIDY (Roblox ID: 474472571) Discord ID: 520335239311130636 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS Violation – Use of Racial Slur Staff Member: Not listed Evidence Reviewed: Evidence Clip – https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1054099159810060289/1350916167660998656/IHFOTJgFGymCeql7w6hDQ.mp4 Summary of Appeal: The user admits to using a racial slur in a joking manner during an interaction with a law enforcement player at the dealership. They state the intent was not malicious, but acknowledge it was inappropriate and against community standards. The appeal expresses remorse, emphasizes that the rules have since been reviewed, and asks for a second chance to return to roleplay respectfully. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated With Warning After reviewing the video and considering the appeal: The slur was clearly used and is not permitted under any circumstance, regardless of context or tone. The user takes full accountability for the incident and does not attempt to justify or minimize the impact. This is the user’s first major violation, and their response shows genuine understanding of the issue. While the ban reason remains justified, we believe this appeal warrants a second chance with a formal warning on record. Outcome: Ban lifted A formal warning has been placed in the user’s history for V-TOS violation Any future slur usage or V-TOS breaches will result in immediate permanent removal from the community We appreciate the honesty in this appeal. Mountain Interactive does not tolerate the use of slurs under any circumstances. All players are expected to uphold respectful standards at all times. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Secret_Division (Roblox ID: 6098662173) Discord ID: 1307556129735184417 Ban Type: Past Ban Record Appeal (Not currently banned) Ban in Question: Ban ID [67130] – 3 Days Ban Reason: RDM x2, SI x2, PB Staff Member: ⭐Cookie Evidence Reviewed: Video 1 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvCSfMQ0atc Video 2 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlw6kmcbco Ban record, warnings, and all attached moderation notes Summary of Appeal: The user is not currently banned but is requesting the removal of a prior 3-day ban from March 2, 2025. They claim they have reflected on their past behavior, and they would like to clear their record in order to pursue further opportunities within the community. They do not deny the actions but believe they have changed since then. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Record Will Remain After full review of the evidence and moderation history: Ban ID 67130 is fully supported by video evidence showing two unprovoked kills, interference with staff in an active scene, and abusive conduct while in a position of authority. These are direct violations of: [Section 2.2] – Random Deathmatch [Section 2.3] – Escalation [Section 5.0] – Staff Interference [Section 4.3] – Power-Based RP This was not an isolated incident. The user has a pattern of repeated issues involving: [Ban ID 60190] – Team Abuse [Kick ID 4471] – GTA-D Role Abuse Warnings for: RDM, FRP, IWFD (emergency role misuse) Evidence from previous incidents (e.g., https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/jbWQctXl4np4Uaq1H, https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k1diw8TrFClrhZ4sL) consistently shows unrealistic, escalated, or abusive roleplay behavior over time. Due to the number of documented incidents and confirmed rule violations, this record must remain on file. Appeal approval would compromise staff visibility into repeat offenses. Outcome: The ban record will not be removed No additional enforcement is being taken The user remains eligible to participate in the community but is on watch for any further violations Continued clean behavior over time may support future role applications or record reevaluation We encourage the user to stay committed to their improvement and to lead by example if aiming for future trust and responsibility. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: XxTheVibezEpic (Roblox ID: 2248906394) Discord ID: 846703502460715028 (spixzz) Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: BH (Body Humping) Staff Member: polski.huligan Evidence Reviewed: YouTube Clip – https://youtu.be/o-0_YrIPk0o Summary of Appeal: The user admits to participating in body humping during a session on a small server while joking around with a friend. They claim they were unaware it was against the rules at the time. After the ban, the user states they reviewed the rules and now understands why it was inappropriate. They express remorse and ask for a second chance, emphasizing that they want to contribute positively to the community going forward. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Warning Noted After reviewing the video evidence and the user’s moderation history: The behavior in the video clearly violates Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only, as body humping is considered inappropriate and disruptive. However, the user has no prior warnings or bans before this incident, and the behavior appears to have been isolated and not malicious in nature. The tone of the appeal is respectful, and the user demonstrates a genuine willingness to improve and follow the rules. Outcome: Ban has already expired; no further action needed. A formal note will remain on file for reference. Any future similar behavior will result in a longer suspension or permanent action. This is a reminder that even in smaller or less populated sessions, community standards and conduct rules still apply. All users are expected to maintain respectful roleplay behavior regardless of server size or activity. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Alia9055 (Roblox ID: 1522073716) Discord ID: 834081664766181437 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: FRP (Fail Roleplay) – Unlawful vehicle interaction during active scene Staff Member: MysticMeadow23 Evidence Reviewed: Video – https://youtu.be/_bPUapDmkF0 Moderation History: 2 Prior Bans (RDM, FRP) 2 Prior Warnings (RDM, FRP) Multiple notes confirming ongoing borderline behavior and a prior accepted appeal Summary of AppealThe user denies opening the vehicle trunk but admits to roleplaying “licking” it. They argue that trunk interaction isn't FRP because CHP vehicles wouldn't auto-lock at low speeds, and no roleplay to lock the car was issued. The user further claims another player was repeatedly interacting with the trunk, and that the ban may have mistaken their roleplay action for an actual game-triggered one. They also argue that the officer shouting “I’m reporting for FRP” mid-scene was also breaking RP. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Pattern of FRP ConfirmedAfter reviewing the video: The scene shows a group engaging in unrealistic behavior at a police stop. Whether or not the user directly opened the trunk, the roleplay action of “licking a trooper’s trunk” in a chaotic scene is not only non-serious, but deliberately disruptive to the RP environment. The appeal attempts to justify the behavior using real-life logic and claims of misidentification — however, this exact type of behavior is already documented in their prior FRP warning and FRP ban, making this part of a clear pattern. Additional concern: The user includes an admission that they “shot” the trooper later in the scene. While not the main reason for this specific ban, it supports the evidence of non-compliant RP behavior and further undermines the appeal’s credibility. This directly violates: [Section 2.1 – General RP Rules (Unrealistic Behavior)] [Section 2.3 – Situational Escalation] [Section 1.5 – Common Sense & Community Conduct] Outcome:Ban remains active and will expire automatically No action will be taken to shorten or reverse the penalty This serves as a final warning: future FRP or disruptive behavior will result in longer bans or full removal from the community User is encouraged to re-review the Community Rules and roleplay standards before rejoining Mountain Interactive expects all players to maintain immersion and treat law enforcement roleplay with respect. Disruptive antics—especially after prior warnings—will be met with escalating enforcement. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Alia9055 (Roblox ID: 1522073716) Discord ID: 834081664766181437 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 day) Ban Reason: FRP (Fail Roleplay) – Unlawful vehicle interaction during RP scene Staff Member: MysticMeadow23 Evidence Reviewed: Video Evidence – https://youtu.be/_bPUapDmkF0 Ban Record: 2 Prior Bans (RDM, FRP) 2 Prior Warnings (RDM, FRP) Multiple internal notes tied to repeat behavior and previous appeals Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were falsely blamed for opening a trooper’s trunk and argues that the action wasn’t FRP, stating IRL you could open a trunk under certain conditions. They also say another person was repeatedly opening the trunk and that they merely roleplayed “licking” the trunk. They believe the ban is based on a misunderstanding and point to multiple people being present at the scene. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Pattern of FRP Confirmed Upon review of the full video evidence and moderation history: The clip shows clear and intentional interaction with the vehicle (repeated activation of the trunk during an RP scene with law enforcement), without RP context or justification. The "licking the trunk" comment, even if not the direct cause of the interaction, contributes to a scene that escalated into unrealistic and disruptive roleplay. Prior moderation history includes multiple FRP-related warnings and a previous ban — this is a continued pattern of pushing unrealistic behavior in serious roleplay scenarios. Regarding the user’s defense: Real-life justifications (e.g., “you could do this IRL”) do not override community standards. Vehicles are assumed locked unless otherwise roleplayed. The lack of a /me or /do does not justify forcing interaction with government vehicles during scenes. The claim that others were also doing it does not absolve the user of responsibility. Outcome: Ban will remain active and expire as scheduled No further action will be taken at this time, but this serves as a final notice: Any further FRP incidents will likely result in longer bans or permanent action The user is strongly advised to re-review Section 2.1 – General RP Rules and community conduct standards Repeat violations, especially after being given multiple chances, will not continue to be tolerated. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected] https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: GeraSheriff (Roblox ID: Not provided) Discord ID: Not provided Ban Type: Game Ban Ban Reason: RDM (Random Deathmatch) Staff Member: Reported under Ban ID: 70092 – Logged by @CoolkrasLost Evidence Reviewed: Medal Clip – https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k6HqTL6EHUGO25NXG?invite=cr-MSxEekUsMjI0NDI4MjIw Summary of Appeal: The user claims they encountered another player (referred to as "AMR girl") at the gun store, exchanged a few words, then shot them after believing they were preparing for conflict. The user believes they had a valid RP reason to engage, stating that the target made a radio call and said something that sounded like a threat. They also criticize the admin who issued the ban, stating they were not allowed to fully explain and that the admin dismissed their defense without proper review. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – RDM Confirmed After reviewing the full video: The clip shows the user approaching a player, initiating minor conversation, and then opening fire. The other player makes no verbal or physical threat, nor is there any weapon drawn or hostile behavior. A radio call is made, but without any hostile words or action from the other party. The kill appears entirely one-sided, with no clear RP escalation, no direct threat, and no proper justification for lethal force. This falls under a clear violation of Section 2.2 – Random Deathmatch (RDM), which requires valid RP reason and clear escalation before engaging in combat. Additionally, the behavior toward staff in the appeal is dismissive and implies misuse of authority, yet no misconduct by staff was identified in the logs. Staff are required to make quick decisions during scene reviews, and evidence supports their judgment here. Outcome: The ban will remain in place. The user may submit a new appeal after 7 days, provided it includes: A respectful tone and complete understanding of the rule broken A statement on how escalation works and when shooting is appropriate Attempts to blame staff or misrepresent facts without evidence will not help future appeals Mountain Interactive is built on realistic, fair, and immersive roleplay. Situations like this — shooting without threat — harm the experience for others and will always be handled seriously. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Nicrox_x (Roblox ID: 4468383405) Discord ID: 1155108167701778523 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: MRDM (Mass Random Deathmatch), SI (Staff Interference) Staff Member: Logged under Ban ID 69194 Evidence Reviewed: Screenshot evidence: https://imgur.com/a/repost-evidence-Xalg54H Internal ban record: Ban ID 69194 Summary of Appeal: The user explains that they came across a police scene where their friend was being arrested and, in an attempt to intervene, opened fire on four officers. They acknowledge this resulted in a ban for MRDM and SI. In their appeal, the user expresses regret and states they have now reviewed the rules, watched roleplay guides, and better understand how their actions broke RP. They request a second chance, stating they understand the mistake and would not repeat it. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – MRDM and SI Confirmed The provided evidence shows the following: The user approached a routine arrest scene, where law enforcement was actively processing a civilian. Without any RP initiation, escalation, or communication, the user opened fire and killed four officers in rapid succession. One of the victims was a staff member actively handling the scene, making this not only Mass RDM but also Staff Interference. No coordination, group planning, or RP justification was presented before or after the action. This directly violates: [Section 2.2 – Random Deathmatch (RDM)] [Section 2.3 – Escalation Rules] [Section 2.3.1 – Mass RDM (MRDM)] [Section 5.0 – Staff Scene Interference (SI)] While we recognize the user has reflected and shown effort to improve, the seriousness of these violations — especially in a public scene involving a staff-led arrest — makes reinstatement at this time inappropriate. Outcome: The permanent ban remains active User may appeal again in 30 days, but must include: A detailed acknowledgment of each rule violated A realistic plan for avoiding future misconduct Agreement to avoid all forms of alt account usage during the waiting period Any evasion or misuse of alternate accounts will result in permanent appeal revocation. We appreciate the respectful tone of the appeal and encourage continued rule study. Future chances depend on demonstrated growth and transparency. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: kustimustikas123 (Roblox ID: 3922320359) Discord ID: 1234513274339459213 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Los Angeles) Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service / inappropriate content) Staff Member: oogabooga116 Evidence Reviewed: Medal Clip – https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k6IzRAMTBnRD6UTmf?invite=cr-MSxGRnosMTkxMzY1NzI1 Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges making an inappropriate joke ("this rifle is longer than your pickle") and claims it was meant as humor, not disrespect. They explain they didn’t fully realize the implications of the comment at the time but now understand why it violated the rules. The appeal expresses sincere regret and emphasizes their intention to think before speaking in the future. They ask for a second chance and admit they’ve learned from the ban. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Final Chance Granted Upon reviewing the clip: The user makes a clearly inappropriate and sexually suggestive joke in a public VC context, which does violate Section 1.3 – Respectful Content Only and could fall under V-TOS due to the community's younger audience. However, the behavior does not appear malicious or targeted, and the user immediately stops when corrected. The appeal is respectfully written, expresses clear understanding of the rule now, and shows a willingness to grow. We believe this situation warrants a second chance under final warning conditions. Any further violations of this nature will result in an irreversible community ban. Outcome: Ban lifted User returns under a final warning Any future violations involving NSFW jokes, suggestive remarks, or disrespectful content will result in a non-appealable permanent ban We appreciate your honesty. Please remember Mountain Interactive is a diverse and mixed-age community — always keep your conduct respectful and safe for everyone involved. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: roryj2012 (Roblox ID: 1139216781) Discord ID: 1324031419600867471 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Violation of TR (Training Regulations) Staff Member: Not listed Evidence Provided: Ban screenshot only – original video evidence is no longer accessible Summary of Appeal: The user states they were permanently banned approximately one year ago for violating TR (Training Regulations). They admit to being unaware at the time that their actions were against the rules but now fully take responsibility. They express guilt and a desire to return to the community, noting that they did not understand the rule they had broken but now acknowledge their mistake. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstatement Granted Given the following considerations: The ban is over one year old The user takes full responsibility and expresses remorse No evidence is currently available to dispute or further investigate the original violation The appeal is respectfully written and shows willingness to improve We are granting a second chance under probation terms. This reinstatement does not excuse the original offense, but reflects our belief in redemption and growth over time.

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Agent_wolf155 (Roblox ID: 5387774259) Discord ID: 1282789657649872958 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Los Angeles) Ban Reason: NLR, RDM, and V-NG abuse Staff Member: Haydz6 Evidence Provided: YouTube Clip – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awAFdzSrq_A Summary of Appeal: The user admits to violating multiple rules, including New Life Rule (NLR), Random Deathmatch (RDM), and improper use of National Guard vehicles (V-NG). They express repeated apologies and take responsibility for their actions. The appeal is centered on remorse and a promise to follow the rules moving forward, requesting a second chance and asking not to be permanently removed from the community. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Multiple Major Violations Confirmed After reviewing the full video evidence, the following violations were confirmed: RDM: The user exited a military vehicle and fatally shot another player without any form of RP interaction or escalation. NLR: The user was killed in combat, then returned to the same location and re-engaged shortly after respawning — violating the New Life Rule. V-NG Abuse: The user operated a military HEMTT vehicle without proper RP structure or coordination. The vehicle was used for solo patrols and engagement in civilian zones, which is prohibited under faction rules. These actions reflect a pattern of serious disruption to roleplay and public gameplay environments. The behavior captured in the video is not isolated or accidental, but rather sustained and intentional. Outcome: The permanent ban will remain in place. No new appeal will be accepted for 14 days from the date of this decision. Future appeals must demonstrate: Full acknowledgment of all rule violations A clear plan for improvement and conduct No further alt use or evasion attempts Alt account misuse will result in a full appeal lock and extended enforcement. We appreciate the honesty in your appeal, but due to the scale of disruption, a reinstatement is not possible at this time. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

No problem! We also agree

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: 2012jahhh (Roblox ID: Not provided) Discord ID: 1216436672187858984 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Los Angeles) Ban Reason: Cuff Rushing while on a One-Strike Warning Evidence Provided: [Video reviewed – "20250222194715956 (1).mp4"] Staff Member: Ban issued by Moderation Team Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges they were banned for cuff rushing while already under a one-strike warning. They express regret and apologize, stating they have reviewed the rules and now understand the seriousness of the violation. The appeal requests a second chance and assures the user’s intent to follow all server rules going forward. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Final Chance Granted After reviewing the video and context: The cuff rushing incident is confirmed in the footage, which clearly shows an attempt to arrest without proper RP escalation. However, the user takes full responsibility for their actions and submitted a respectful, well-written appeal. The tone of the message reflects genuine understanding and remorse, and the acknowledgment of prior warnings adds credibility to their intent to improve. As a result, we are issuing a one-time reinstatement under strict conditions. Outcome: Ban lifted, effective immediately One-Strike Policy reinstated – any future serious rule violation will result in a non-appealable permanent ban User is expected to re-read and comply fully with Mountain Interactive’s Rules We appreciate your honesty and willingness to take accountability. You’ve been given a second chance — use it wisely. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected] https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionMOUNTAIN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT TERMINATIONAppealing User: malak (Roblox Username: Ph0nkyT0wn | Roblox ID: 1877968346) Discord ID: 1296963078767902721 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Perris) Ban Reason: Creating or using an account to avoid enforcement Staff Member: Automated System Detection Evidence Provided: Internal moderation logs, system flags, user ban history Summary of Appeal: The user states they were away from their device when the ban occurred and denies any intent to avoid prior enforcement actions. They claim they were previously playing without issue and do not recall violating any rules. The appeal requests a second chance, expressing enjoyment of the game and a desire not to negatively impact others' experiences. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Ban Evasion Confirmed After reviewing the automated logs and ban history: The account Ph0nkyT0wn was flagged and permanently banned after being linked to a previously banned account that was removed for exploiting. Shortly after the original ban, this new account was created and used to rejoin the game — a clear violation of Section 2.5 – Alt Account Use and Ban Evasion. Whether intentional or not, the use of an alternate account following a permanent enforcement action is a strict breach of our policies. We appreciate the tone of the appeal, but unfortunately, alt account creation after a permanent ban results in a non-appealable status unless approved through a full staff override — which does not apply in this case. Outcome: The permanent ban will remain in place. The original exploit-related ban still stands. No further appeals will be accepted unless new information is provided under the original banned identity. For transparency, this action and all related enforcement will remain recorded in our moderation logs. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]