David

Ban Appeal Review Decision(CEASE AND DESIST FORWARDED / HARRASMENT)Appealing User: ztassin55 Discord ID: 1295192413765369898 Original Discord ID (prior to switch): 1039376290265960508 Ban Type: Permanent Discord Ban Ban Reason: Impersonation – Participation in a fake “Mountain Studios” server Staff Member: Ash (Corporate Team) Appeal Thread: Original Appeal Thread on MI Forums Summary of Appeal: The user was banned for being involved in a fake “Mountain Studios” Discord server that attempted to impersonate Mountain Interactive’s branding. The user states they joined the server “to check it out,” did not realize they were given a high-ranking role, and claims they were offline for a few days before discovering they were banned from the main Mountain Interactive Discord. They also stated they intended to leave the impersonation server afterward. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Involvement in Brand Impersonation Server After reviewing internal logs and the appeal: The user was banned for impersonation as part of a mass moderation action taken against participants in a Discord server that misrepresented itself as affiliated with Mountain Interactive (a violation of Discord’s ToS and MI’s community rules). Regardless of whether or not the user created or actively moderated the server, being listed with a high-ranking role in an impersonation server is taken seriously. This role was not automatically assigned and indicates a perceived level of trust or involvement. [Section 1.5] of our Community Rules ("Common Sense & Community Trust") makes clear that: While the user claims they were unaware and intended to leave, this explanation was only provided after the ban and there is no proactive record of them reporting the impersonation or distancing themselves beforehand. Outcome: Ban will remain in effect. Participation in impersonation efforts — even passively — erodes the trust required for our community. No further appeals will be considered unless verifiable proof is provided that the user had no knowledge or involvement in the impersonation effort at the time. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: sens (Roblox not listed) Discord ID: 1205177596606681119 Ban Type: Permanent Discord Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS Violation Staff Member: @krovix. Ban Record: Case #10330 Date of Ban: April 18, 2025 Evidence Reviewed: Internal team log for V-TOS Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges their actions and takes full responsibility for inappropriate conduct in the Mountain Interactive Discord server. The appeal expresses remorse for insults directed at another user during a moment of personal frustration. The user states a desire to make amends, redeem themselves, and contribute positively moving forward. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Severity and Context of Violation After careful review of the incident and user history: The user was permanently banned due to behavior that constituted a Violation of Terms of Service (V-TOS) under our Community Guidelines, specifically: [Section 1.3] Respectful Content Only – Users must not engage in personal attacks, threats, or harassment. [Section 1.5] Common Sense & Community Trust – All members are expected to use sound judgment in conduct and communication. The violation involved targeted, aggressive insults toward another community member, which is considered a zero-tolerance offense. Regardless of emotion or frustration, such language and behavior break the core values of our community and Discord policies. While the apology is acknowledged and appreciated, the nature and severity of the violation, along with the user’s prior standing, do not support reinstatement at this time. Outcome: Discord access remains revoked permanently. No further appeals will be accepted unless substantial, verifiable context or staff error is presented. Any future attempt to bypass this ban via alt accounts will result in additional enforcement actions. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Hello, You are not banned from our discord.

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: mqpf (Discord ID: 1055614304575033394) Ban Type: Permanent (exact length unspecified) Ban Reason: Fabricated Discord Message / Staff Impersonation (V-TOS Violation) Staff Member: david.is59012 Evidence Reviewed: Ban Log Entry: Case #10346, Reason: "bye" Appeal Claim: User asserts they were banned due to a misinterpreted joke, claims David also "joked about it." Context: User generated and shared an inspect-elemental Discord message falsely implying a staff member used a racial slur. Message content was manipulated. Moderation History: Case #10346: Permanent ban for staff-related impersonation/falsified message Case #9279: 2-hour mute for spam after being told to stop (January 4, 2025) Case #7767: Warning for inappropriate language (July 15, 2024) Summary of Appeal: The user claims they did not engage in any wrongdoing and asserts the ban was related to a joke or error. However, logs and context confirm the user manually manipulated a Discord message via browser tools to make it appear as if a staff member said a slur, then posted or circulated that image. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Serious Violation of Community Trust The offense directly violates multiple rules: [Section 1.5] Community Trust and Common Sense [Section 1.9] Forging, Falsifying, or Manipulating Evidence [Section 1.8] Platform Integrity (includes inspect element abuse or impersonation) Falsifying staff messages, especially those involving racial slurs, constitutes a serious breach of trust and damages the integrity of the moderation process and the Mountain Interactive community. This behavior is not tolerated under any circumstance. Outcome: The ban will remain in effect. No further appeals will be accepted at this time. Users are reminded that impersonation, falsified messages, or misuse of developer tools to alter appearance of content is treated as an extreme violation. This type of conduct places undue strain on moderation staff and creates confusion or reputational harm to others. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: mindpaced (Roblox ID: 3220915670) Discord ID: 1203536098609864728 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service) Staff Member: cruz8792 Ban Date: April 20, 2025 Case ID: 10348 Summary of Appeal:The user admits to making an inappropriate joke in-game, stating they are 13 years old and didn’t intend harm. They express regret for their “immature” behavior, acknowledging the comment came across as “gross.” The appeal emphasizes that the intent was humor, not malice, and asks for leniency as a younger player who made a mistake. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Violation ConfirmedAfter reviewing the case and moderation context: The V-TOS violation involved inappropriate and offensive language that breached the community’s core standards for respectful behavior. Regardless of age or intent, Mountain Interactive maintains a zero-tolerance policy for comments that violate Section 1.1 – Respectful Content Only, which prohibits sexual, explicit, or grossly inappropriate remarks. Admitting the joke was “gross” and that it “went too far” confirms awareness that the behavior was not acceptable. Purchasing game passes or using Robux does not justify or excuse behavior that makes the environment unsafe for others. Outcome:The permanent ban will remain in place. No further appeals will be reviewed unless significant time has passed and proof of behavior change is provided. We encourage all players to review our rules at mountaininteractive.com/rules before participating in the community again in the future. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected]

Final Decision: ✅ No Action Needed – Warning Not FoundAfter reviewing the moderation records, there is no active warning for LTAP on your account as of April 17, 2025. It's likely the staff member you spoke with already removed it or the warning was never formally added. No further action is required, and your record remains clean in regard to this issue. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: ZenixSin (Roblox ID: 4865908504) Discord ID: 1134500215982927962 Warning Type: FRP (Fail Roleplay) Game: Los Angeles Warning Date: January 31, 2025 Staff Member: wil Evidence Reviewed: Original Clip Attached to Warning Summary of Appeal:The user claims the evidence related to their FRP warning is no longer available and requests removal based on the lack of accessible proof. They express a willingness to accept responsibility if the action did occur, stating they want to improve and maintain a clean record. Final Decision: ❌ Warning Upheld – Evidence Confirms ViolationUpon full review: The video is still active and viewable via YouTube and was included in the original moderation log. The clip clearly shows the user engaging in behavior that meets the criteria for FailRP, including unrealistic actions within a public RP environment that disrupt standard gameplay. The user has a long pattern of rule violations, including: 3 bans (1 of which included FRP and NITRP as recently as March) This warning occurred right between two FRP-related bans Multiple FRP-linked actions across January to March, some of which were appealed and reduced, indicating leniency already provided Violated Rule(s):[2.5] Fail Roleplay (FRP) “Engaging in actions that are unrealistic or outside the boundaries of reasonable RP... includes but is not limited to unrealistic driving, combat behavior, or character conduct.” Outcome:The warning will remain on the user’s record Continued trend of FRP-related incidents indicates this warning was part of a broader behavioral concern Any future issues of the same type may result in stricter disciplinary action The user is encouraged to focus on long-term improvement and utilize the Mountain Interactive Rules as a guide to avoid further sanctions. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: oliveiras9 (Roblox ID: 121407699) Discord ID: 525526242682994692 Warning Type: NLR (New Life Rule) & SI (Scene Interference) Game: Perris, California Warning Date: April 16, 2025 Staff Member: pokedigge900 Evidence Reviewed: Video Logs via Staff Report (Discord Media): Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Moderation History: 3 warnings including LTAA (Jan 8), PD (June 2024), and current NLR/SI 1 prior day ban for FRP (Mar 23, 2025) Recent kick for NLR (April 9) Moderation history indicates repeated RP violations within 30 days Summary of Appeal: The user argues that they did not violate NLR, as they did not return to the specific location where they died, and instead responded to a new location based on fresh information relayed through in-character communication (VC/radio). They also claim that Scene Interference (SI) does not apply because they were a party member rejoining a related but geographically separate encounter. Final Decision: ❌ Warning Upheld – Improper Re-entry into Active Scene After full review of the videos and appeal: In the footage, the user is confirmed to have died in a shootout and re-engaged in the same scenario shortly after through proximity and continued involvement with their group. While they may not have returned to the exact GPS coordinates of their death, the new entry into the evolving same pursuit is still considered part of the original scene, violating NLR guidelines: Furthermore, their re-entry mid-pursuit without visible re-initiation RP or valid justification aligns with: The rules also explicitly restrict re-involvement via alternate positioning when the scene is still active, even with VC or team communication. Scene continuity and realism are expected to be respected even across map zones. Outcome: ⚠️ Warning for NLR and SI will remain on the user’s record Due to repeated infractions, continued disregard for RP boundaries may result in elevated future actions User is advised to avoid all related scenes after death, regardless of location, and allow a full reset period before rejoining ongoing events — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: hatchetrat (Roblox ID not provided) Discord ID: 805128357254529044 Warning Type: FRP (Fail Roleplay) Game: Perris, California Warning Date: February 10, 2024 Staff Member: Not listed (staff member no longer with the team) Evidence Reviewed: No evidence was attached to the original warning No context logs, video, or explanation found on file Moderation History: User currently has no other active FRP warnings or recent similar violations Previous RDM warning recently overturned due to confirmed staff misapplication User maintains clean conduct record for the past year Summary of Appeal: The user is requesting removal of an old FRP warning from over a year ago. They state there was no video or report message ever sent to them, and they have no memory of being spoken to about the violation. The user emphasizes that they’ve grown since the time it was issued and have followed the rules consistently since then. Final Decision: ✅ Warning Removed – No Record or Evidence on File After reviewing available records: There is no attached video, mod note, or summary supporting the original FRP warning. Additionally, the issuing staff member is no longer on the moderation team, and we have no context to evaluate the action. Given that this warning is over a year old, was never acknowledged through direct message or review, and the user has maintained a clean record since, we consider this warning expired and improperly documented. Outcome: FRP warning from February 2024 has been removed from the user’s record No further action will be taken User is encouraged to continue their positive contribution to the community and maintain clean RP standards moving forward — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Updated Final Decision (with video confirmation):Warning Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: hatchetrat (Roblox ID not provided) Discord ID: 805128357254529044 Warning Type: RDM Game: Perris, California Warning Date: March 25, 2025 Staff Member: Not listed Evidence Reviewed: Clip Provided — originally submitted in a player report Video clearly shows the user being randomly killed without provocation or engagement Moderation History: No prior warnings or bans referenced No other actions tied to this incident Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were incorrectly warned when submitting a report. The evidence they originally provided was misapplied to them instead of the offending party, and they now request the warning be removed from their record. Final Decision: ✅ Warning Removed – Incorrect Application Confirmed After reviewing the video and appeal details: It’s clear that the user was the victim of RDM, not the offender. The video shows no roleplay initiation or hostile intent from the appealing user, confirming that the warning was mistakenly issued. This has now been corrected. Outcome: RDM warning has been fully cleared from the user’s record No additional action needed Staff will internally review this type of issue to prevent mislabeling reports in the future — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Updated Final Decision: ❌ Warning Upheld – Use of Lethal Force Without Clear JustificationWhile the appeal showed a genuine misunderstanding of the situation, and the player may not have intended to RDM, the clip clearly shows the user opening fire on a player who was not posing an active threat, violating: [Section 2.2] – PvP Guidelines [Section 2.1] – Roleplay Integrity (Lethal force must be reactive or properly escalated) There is no indication the other player fired or aimed at the officer, and the area was not clearly marked as an active threat zone. Officers must verify threats and use non-lethal options or voice warnings before engaging civilians or armed individuals who are not attacking. Outcome: Warning will remain on record No escalation to further action User is advised to review proper use of force standards when roleplaying as law enforcement to avoid future warnings — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: GamingFu1give (Roblox ID: 2678997714) Discord ID: 1128773394121375814 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: AA (Alt Accounting) Staff Member: Ash Z. Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 65053 – Alt account usage Linked alt account: BUG6Tennis User was under One Strike Policy at the time of violation Moderation History: No prior warnings or kicks Placed under One Strike Policy on January 12, 2025 Permanently banned on January 31, 2025 for ban evasion via alternate account No appeals submitted prior to this request Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges being banned for alt accounting and additional rule violations such as fail driving and ignoring combat timers. They state that after taking time away from Roblox, they now better understand the rules and would like a second chance to return and follow them properly. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – One Strike Policy Violation The user was placed under an active One Strike Policy before this incident. Despite that, they attempted to bypass enforcement by accessing the game using an alternate account, directly violating: [Section 5.2] – Ban Evasion and Account Circumvention [Section 2.1] – General RP Guidelines (FailRP) [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust The One Strike Policy is clearly outlined and non-negotiable once a final enforcement occurs. This ban was the result of a confirmed violation after that policy was applied, and the appeal does not directly acknowledge or take accountability for that agreement. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in effect User may reapply for appeal no earlier than 60 days from today, and only with a full acknowledgment of the One Strike Policy terms Any further attempts to rejoin using other accounts will result in full platform-level removal from the community — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Appeal Format invalid - Resubmit appeal with proper format

Ban Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: Bummel100 (Roblox ID: 2908639666) Discord ID: N/A Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service) Staff Member: AerialOperations Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 62926 – V-TOS Moderator Log: Discord Reference Prior Ban ID 58784 – LTAA, RDM (with clip) Moderation History: 1 prior short-term ban for LTAA and RDM 1 permanent ban for V-TOS (inappropriate language or content) No prior warnings on record Summary of Appeal: The user claims confusion about the meaning of "V-TOS" and denies making any offensive or slur-based remarks, stating they only said "hawk tuah." They assert a case of mistaken identity and request to be unbanned, apologizing generally for any harm caused while also denying the specific behavior they were banned for. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – V-TOS Violation Confirmed After reviewing the evidence and moderator notes: The V-TOS ban was issued based on direct moderation review of chat logs, where the user made comments containing filtered and inappropriate terms in public or proximity chat. This violates: [Section 1.1] – Respectful Content Only [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance While the user disputes making the specific statement that resulted in the ban, the reviewing moderator verified the log prior to enforcement. In cases of V-TOS or inappropriate content, staff actions are not taken lightly and must be supported by clear evidence. The user's prior ban for RDM and LTAA also establishes a minor but relevant pattern of disruptive behavior, further reducing the benefit of the doubt in this case. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in place No further appeals will be accepted unless new, clear evidence emerges showing this ban was issued in error Users are reminded that filtered, disrespectful, or inappropriate language — even if said jokingly — is subject to permanent removal under community standards — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: 3xFyQRN (Roblox ID: 1770409289) Discord ID: 888678471688155196 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Exploiting (EXP), followed by alternate account usage Staff Member: RylanBLP Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID not listed in system, but logged in moderation archives Initial admission of exploiting User’s own statement confirming alt usage following ban Moderation History: Confirmed use of exploits to track and locate another player Admitted alt usage to bypass permanent ban No prior warnings or bans before the exploiting incident, but the nature of the offense bypasses standard escalation Summary of Appeal: The user admits to using exploits during a heated moment after being killed and robbed in-game. Instead of reporting through proper channels, they used unfair methods to track the player. After being banned, the user also admits they created and played on an alternate account. They now express remorse for both offenses, stating they’ve stopped exploiting, played fairly on the alt, and made new friends in the community. The appeal requests forgiveness and reinstatement based on time passed and growth since the incident. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Exploitation and Ban Evasion After reviewing the appeal and the user's full acknowledgment of behavior: The use of exploits to gain an advantage in a PvP or economy-based roleplay scenario is a severe breach of trust and directly violates: [Section 2.6] – Use of Exploits, Scripts, or External Tools [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust This situation was further escalated by the user’s deliberate choice to evade the permanent ban by creating and using an alternate account, which violates: [Section 5.2] – Ban Evasion and Account Circumvention While the appeal is well-written and sincere, and the user demonstrates an understanding of the impact their behavior caused, the combination of confirmed exploiting followed by ban evasion removes the opportunity for reconsideration at this time. Outcome: Appeal denied. The permanent ban remains in effect Any attempts to rejoin under a different account will result in additional enforcement If a future appeal is submitted, it must be at least 6 months from the date of this decision and include proof of continued commitment to fair play and community trust Mountain Interactive does not tolerate exploiters or players who knowingly bypass enforcement decisions. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: PedroXD2008 (Roblox ID: 89886027) Discord ID: 1032432355408879737 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: RDM Staff Member: InternalHypothesis Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70207 – RDM Evidence Clip Prior Ban ID 57926 – x1 RDM Ban ID 58175 – RDM Warning ID 17843 – RDM Clip Moderation History: 3 RDM bans total, progressively increasing in severity 1 active RDM warning All offenses are combat-related with no sign of improvement or behavior correction Summary of Appeal: The user explains they were in an apartment doing illegal RP activity and claims they assumed the officer outside was preparing to arrest or kill them. In response to what they describe as fear of losing in-game assets, they preemptively shot the officer before any interaction was initiated. They acknowledge being scared but state they don’t believe a permanent ban is necessary. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Repeated RDM Behavior After reviewing the clip and appeal: The video shows the user exiting the apartment and immediately opening fire on the officer without any direct threat or provocation. This was a clear instance of random deathmatch, violating the following rules: [Section 2.2] – Player vs. Player (PvP) Rules [Section 2.1] – Not in the Roleplay / Poor RP Initiation [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust This marks the fourth separate RDM-related action on the user’s record, following multiple prior bans and a warning. Despite progressive discipline, the user has failed to adjust their behavior. The explanation offered (“I was scared of being arrested”) does not justify or excuse a lethal preemptive attack without roleplay initiation. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in place Further appeals will not be reviewed unless significant time has passed and a detailed explanation of reform is submitted User has demonstrated repeated disregard for roleplay and combat standards, disrupting the RP experience for others — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: fdf_gdj2 (Roblox ID: 2623738108) Discord ID: 1306020210129633290 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Underaged Staff Member: <@951891043819851806> Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 55195 – Underaged Screenshot Evidence: https://ibb.co/jTGVW9z, https://ibb.co/7Kmh1Qb Moderation History: 1 permanent ban (underage statement) No prior warnings, kicks, or notes beyond the original enforcement Summary of Appeal: The user states this incident occurred back in 2023 and claims that they were banned due to a typo while confirming their age to someone. They originally typed “11” but then corrected themselves in the same conversation, stating they were 17. They now claim the ban was a misunderstanding and are requesting to be unbanned due to the false interpretation of their message. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Correction Valid After reviewing the screenshots and appeal: The original ban was enforced under [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance, which includes the enforcement of Roblox's Terms of Use. At the time, staff interpreted the user’s message as a self-admission of being underage, which triggered an immediate permanent ban to ensure compliance. However, the user corrected the age within the same exchange. No additional violations or platform safety concerns have followed since then. The correction appears genuine and consistent with the user’s current age and account behavior. Outcome: Ban lifted The user is expected to avoid all age-related discussion moving forward Any future behavior involving age misrepresentation, unsafe conduct, or violation of platform integrity will result in immediate and permanent removal without appeal. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Appeal rejected, please follow the format correctly.

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: WhereRose (Roblox ID: 650512290) Discord ID: 736073421225721906 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (3 Days) Ban Reason: FRP, NITRP, SI, LTAA Staff Member: q_Sxmply Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70212 – Evidence Clip Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were simply driving while in first-person and were unexpectedly shot at by law enforcement. In response, they state they panicked and attempted to flee, circled back without the intent to harm, and eventually left the game due to IRL reasons. The user disputes each charge individually and argues that some rule categories are outdated or not applicable to their case. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Violations Substantiated After thoroughly reviewing the video and context: 1. [Section 2.2] – FailRP / Unrealistic BehaviorThe user repeatedly circles back into an active, armed officer-involved shooting scene while driving erratically and nearly colliding with units. While first-person driving is not inherently FRP, using it as justification for reckless and immersion-breaking driving behavior—especially after gunfire had already been exchanged—does not excuse or override the realism standards expected. 2. [Section 5.1] – Scene Interference (SI)The claim that the user “became” part of the scene due to being shot at is not supported by the footage. The user is seen intentionally returning to the area twice, while police are clearly still engaging in active RP. Entering or re-entering an armed scene without a valid RP reason is explicitly prohibited, and this behavior meets the standard for Scene Interference. 3. [Section 2.1] – Not In The Roleplay (NITRP)While recent moderation messaging has suggested softening the use of "NITRP" as a standalone label, the actions here reflect behavior defined by the core of the term: non-serious, disruptive behavior with no meaningful contribution to the RP scene. Driving into an active shootout with no valid RP lead-up, then leaving mid-scene without notifying staff, supports the application of NITRP under the general expectation of meaningful RP contribution. 4. [Section 2.5] – LTAA (Leave to Avoid Arrest)The user disconnects immediately after fleeing from officers and making a final stop in the middle of the road. Whether the officer had lights activated at that exact second is irrelevant; the entire context—including being pursued in a prior gunfire situation—makes it clear that this was not a clean or safe point to exit the game. Disconnecting while law enforcement is preparing to initiate detainment falls within the scope of LTAA. Outcome: The 3-day ban is valid and will remain in place The user is expected to re-review the following rules before returning: Section 2.1 – NITRP [Section 2.2 – FailRP / PvP Behavior] [Section 2.5 – LTAA] [Section 5.1 – Scene Interference] The staff team appreciates the thoughtfulness of the appeal, but the video evidence and behavior pattern do not support a reversal of this action. — Reviewed and posted by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Greg_9128 (Roblox ID: 7724937287) Discord ID: 1357272200457093201 Ban Type: Temporary Ban (1 Day) Ban Reason: RTAA (Reset to Avoid Arrest) Staff Member: o_hhx Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70114 – RTAA Previous Ban ID 70045 – LTAA Warning issued for FRP (clip) Moderation History: 2 recent bans (LTAA and RTAA within 24 hours) 1 active warning (FailRP) Summary of Appeal: The user claims their brother was using their PC at the time of the RTAA violation and is asking to be unbanned. No further explanation is provided, and there is no acknowledgment of the prior LTAA or the related FRP warning issued just before the ban. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Behavior Pattern Confirmed After reviewing the evidence: The clip clearly shows the user resetting during the arrest booking process in an active RP situation, violating: [Section 2.5] – Resetting/Leaving to Avoid Arrest [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust This comes less than 24 hours after a separate LTAA ban for leaving during a previous arrest scenario. A recent FRP warning was also issued immediately prior to both incidents, establishing a consistent pattern of disrupting RP and avoiding consequences. The explanation of “my brother was on my PC” offers no verifiable proof and is a commonly used excuse in ban evasion and appeal scenarios. It does not override the repeated nature of the behavior captured in logs and video. Outcome: Ban will remain in place and expire automatically after 24 hours User is advised to review community rules carefully, particularly regarding arrest scenarios Any further attempts to avoid RP consequences through resets, disconnects, or excuses may result in longer suspensions or escalation to permanent action The staff team expects full participation in scenes and respect for both players and the roleplay environment. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: hotpocket7000 (Roblox ID: 571104917) Discord ID: 1032435193497255946 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS | Attempting to Bypass Staff Member: Daniel Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID [70124] Staff Log – Discord Prior Warning (RDM) – Clip Moderation History: 1 Warning (RDM – April 15, 2025) 1 Permanent Ban (V-TOS – April 18, 2025) Summary of Appeal: The user admits confusion over the exact cause of the V-TOS violation but expresses a strong desire to return and improve. They highlight that any action taken was done without malice and note their deep appreciation for the community, especially in faction-based RP. The appeal is respectful, self-aware, and focused on growth and future conduct. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Conditions After reviewing the full history and context: The “V-TOS | Attempting to Bypass” ban stemmed from behavior determined to be in violation of Mountain Interactive’s communication and integrity standards — including filtered terms or inappropriate phrasing used in ways that attempted to intentionally circumvent rules or moderation systems. This is a direct violation of: [Section 1.1] – Respectful Content Only [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust The user’s appeal acknowledges the need for greater awareness and takes full responsibility for misunderstanding the impact of their behavior. This is the user’s first major offense, and their tone, remorse, and proactive communication warrant a second chance. Outcome: Ban lifted A formal note is added to the account to track V-TOS involvement User is expected to comply strictly with all communication and RP standards Any future V-TOS violation or rule bypass attempt will result in immediate permanent removal Your appeal shows maturity and honesty. You’re being reinstated with the expectation that you will now uphold the rules you previously violated. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Officer_eevilbb12 (Roblox ID: 726568824) Discord ID: 1163856092632203384 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Administrator’s Discretion (Harassment, Unprofessional Conduct in DMs) Staff Member: Victor Evidence Reviewed: Appeal statements and user-provided clarification Internal staff chat logs regarding incident No warnings or prior bans on file Summary of Appeal: The user was permanently banned on December 30, 2024, for hostile and unprofessional behavior directed toward fellow community members and staff, in response to internal LAPD decisions. The appeal admits that they bypassed proper channels and took the matter into private messages where inappropriate language and personal attacks occurred. The user acknowledges their actions created a hostile environment and accepts full responsibility for the outcome. In a later clarification, they also distanced themselves from the individual whose firing initially triggered their reaction, explicitly denouncing his later actions. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Formal Warning After reviewing the full appeal and context: The user acknowledges their wrongdoing, takes full responsibility, and expresses remorse without deflecting blame. They do not minimize the impact of their behavior, instead offering detailed reflection and insight into why it was wrong. The clarification provided shows a deliberate step away from any association with related disruptive actors and confirms they are not part of ongoing drama or off-platform misconduct. This is the user's first and only disciplinary action on record, with no prior warnings or bans. The ban was justified at the time due to the tone, approach, and environment created — but the reflection and growth since then merit reinstatement. Outcome: Ban lifted A formal warning will be added to the user’s record Any future conduct involving personal harassment, staff disruption, or bypassing moderation channels will result in immediate permanent removal without further appeal Mountain Interactive values accountability, and this appeal demonstrates it. You are being given a second chance — use it to help build a better community for everyone. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: MagicJeety (Roblox ID: 514607406) Discord ID: 1163856092632203384 Ban Type: Permanent Ban (Account + Game Ban) Ban Reason: Requested ban due to repeated disrespect, swearing during appeal attempts, and harassment of staff Staff Member: David / Haydz Evidence Reviewed: Internal moderation records Ban ID [63611] Discord DM transcript between user and David Site appeal: https://mountaininteractive.com/topic/5428-this-is-only-for-david Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges being banned for spamming David’s inbox and admits to using inappropriate language in a prior appeal. They now express regret, apologize for how they handled the situation, and request another opportunity to return to the community respectfully. They followed through with submitting a formal appeal when requested, and provided consistent communication through Discord. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Reinstated with Monitoring After reviewing the full context: The original reason for the ban was not due to in-game exploitation or severe roleplay violation, but rather due to repeated disrespectful appeal behavior and DM spam, which was emotional and impulsive, not malicious. Since then, the user has been cooperative, shown maturity in tone, and acknowledged past actions without shifting blame. This appears to be a case of someone who acted out of frustration but is now seeking a genuine return. The user previously received a one-strike policy, which has now expired (Feb 13, 2025), and they have not attempted evasion or harassment since. Outcome: Ban lifted across all platforms A formal note remains on file referencing prior incidents User is expected to maintain respectful communication at all times moving forward Any future harassment, trolling, or disruptive behavior will result in immediate and non-appealable permanent removal You’ve been given another chance. Use it responsibly. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: Flash056434 (Roblox ID: 2684394992) Discord ID: 1115012711269552168 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: EXP (Exploitation – Use of Infinite Yield) Staff Member: System (automated detection) Evidence Reviewed: Internal anti-cheat flag (EXP – Infinite Yield) Self-admission in ban appeal Community reports and confirmation via Discord server logs Prior moderation actions and warnings Donation Status: User previously donated and held a rank Summary of Appeal: The user admits to using exploits (specifically Infinite Yield) in a private server, acknowledging that they “did it knowing the risk.” They claim nervousness led them to initially lie when banned, but now express regret. The user requests a second chance, citing long-time community involvement and prior purchases in Mountain Interactive titles. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Exploitation Confirmed This appeal confirms: Direct admission to using a known exploit tool (Infinite Yield), which is a severe breach of Mountain Interactive’s Section 2.6 – Exploiting and External Tool Use The user states they were aware it was not allowed, yet chose to do it anyway. Attempted deception following the ban further compounds the issue. The anti-cheat system correctly detected and enforced the ban, and external review from a known exploitation group (Xeno) supports the claim. Additionally: A donation or prior purchase does not exempt any user from community enforcement or rule compliance. The user’s prior moderation history includes: RDM, Tool Abuse, RSI, SI, and a prior ban for V-PT — showing a pattern of disruptive behavior even before the exploitation event. Outcome: The permanent ban will remain in effect No further appeals will be reviewed for this user Community ranks or donor statuses are forfeited upon confirmed exploitation Mountain Interactive maintains zero tolerance for exploiters, regardless of donation status or private server context. Your actions directly undermine the integrity of the community and player experience. — Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Hello Mountain Interactive! We’ve just published an important update to the Mountain Interactive Community Rules — specifically focused on improving how we handle drama, leadership behavior, and internal department conflicts. 🔧 What’s New? We’ve added rules that cover: Abuse of rank or staff power Interdepartmental rivalries (e.g., LAPD vs. LASD drama) Passive-aggressive behavior or cliquing Staff acting emotionally or without evidence People treating RP ranks like real authority Gossip, vagueposting, and off-platform stirring These issues have been quietly causing tension and toxicity across teams — especially between department leaders, staff members, and long-time players. These new rules are here to reset expectations and prevent abuse moving forward. 💡 Why We Did This: We want Mountain Interactive to stay fun, fair, and collaborative. That means: No more weaponizing staff titles or RP ranks. No more internal drama dragging down progress. A clear chain of command for real issues — and clear lines between roleplay and real leadership. 📄 Read the Full Rules Update: 👉 mountaininteractive.com/rules These changes are effective immediately, and all departments and staff members are expected to follow them. Let’s keep this community strong and focused on what we’re building together. — Mountain Interactive Team