David

Player Report Review – Decision IssuedReported User: happyboi9512 (Roblox ID: Unlisted) Report Filed By: Astroiid_ethan (Roblox ID: 1851823212) Report Type: Random Death Match (RDM) Date Reported: April 20, 2025 Evidence Reviewed: Medal Clip – RDM Violation(s):[Section 2.2] – Random Death Match (RDM) Killing another player without proper roleplay initiation or justification. In the reviewed clip, the offender approached a uniformed officer from behind, said “sorry this was a hit,” and executed the player with no lead-up, no scene development, and no clear RP context. [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust The action showed disregard for immersive roleplay standards and contributed to a low-quality, unrealistic experience for other players involved. Final Decision: ❌ Report Valid – 1 Day Ban IssuedThis was a clear violation of our RDM policy. The user initiated a hit-style execution on an officer without any contextual lead-up or valid RP justification. The phrase “this was a hit” does not provide cover for randomly killing players, especially in a law enforcement scene without any player-to-player RP build-up. Outcome: User happyboi9512 has been banned for 1 day for violating our RDM rule [Section 2.2]. Continued behavior like this will result in longer suspensions or permanent removal from the community. Thank you for your report. If you have further questions or believe there's additional information we missed, feel free to follow up via the forums or at [email protected]. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Moderation Report ReviewReported User: memesonly303 Reported By: caprison4175 (Roblox ID: 3862121268) Discord ID (Reporter): 843484114358894613 Game: Perris, California Rule(s) Violated: [2.5] Tool Abuse Summary of Report: The reporter alleges that while attempting to interact with a shootout scene involving deceased suspects, they were approached by user "memesonly303," who ordered them to stop moving a body. After the initial warning, the reporter complied but later returned. At that point, "memesonly303" reportedly used the beanbag shotgun and handcuffs multiple times. Later, as the reporter attempted to leave the area, "memesonly303" pursued them, spiked their tires, and continued to use the beanbag and firearms despite no present threat. Evidence Reviewed: https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/k7CC0SLuoxzGMUeW2?invite=cr-MSw2WFMsNzA0MDkzNDY Moderation History of Reported User: (No prior history on record) Final Decision: ❌ Action Taken – 1 Day Ban Issued The behavior shown in the clip constitutes Tool Abuse under [2.5] of our Community Guidelines. The user repeatedly used non-lethal force (beanbag shotgun) in a manner not aligned with protocol or roleplay standards. Additionally, the use of spike strips and aggressive pursuit without valid threat context or command escalation is unwarranted. The user will be issued a 1-day ban as per Mountain Interactive’s updated enforcement policy that ensures all rule violations of this nature are met with a minimum 24-hour suspension. Next Steps: The reporter has been informed of the action taken. The reported user will receive a notification with the reasoning and rule cited. Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Solved by Members. Report Voided.

Member Report Review Decision Report Filed By: rxvert313 (Roblox ID: 4096731350) Reported User: blueTesla2009 Offense Alleged: RDM (Random Deathmatch) Evidence: Medal Clip 🔍 Review Summary After reviewing the submitted clip, the following was observed: The reporting player was driving in a non-hostile manner when a police officer opened fire without any visible provocation or verbal roleplay initiation. The reporting player exited their vehicle and raised their hands (surrender animation). Despite surrendering and showing no threat, the officer continued to fire and killed the player. There was no sign of the player holding a weapon or initiating any combat before being shot. This behavior is clear-cut Random Deathmatch (RDM) and use of excessive force by a law enforcement role without any justification. 📘 Rules Violated [2.2.1] Players must have clear, justified roleplay reasons to initiate combat. [2.2.4] Lethal force should only be used if the player poses an immediate and dangerous threat. [2.5] Players must respect community roleplay standards and avoid actions that disrupt immersion and fairness. ✅ Final Decision: Violation Confirmed Moderation Action: 🔻 1-Day Temporary Ban issued to blueTesla2009 for unjustified use of lethal force and failure to follow roleplay procedures as a law enforcement role. @rxvert313 – Thank you for reporting this. Based on the evidence provided, appropriate moderation action has been taken. We encourage all players to continue upholding roleplay standards and report similar conduct if it occurs again. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team 📜 https://mountaininteractive.com/rules 📧 [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: Karlos_Division (Roblox ID not provided) Discord ID: 1258798753431945323 Warning Date: April 17, 2025 Warning Reason: David Impersonation Staff Member: @david.is59012 Summary of Appeal: The user was warned for “David Impersonation” after appearing in-game with a Roblox avatar resembling the CEO of Mountain Interactive. In the appeal, they argue that the outfit is a publicly available item and that there is no stated rule prohibiting others from wearing similar combinations. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Warning Stands After review: While the outfit components may be public assets, impersonation is not about asset ownership — it's about intent and presentation, especially when the appearance can mislead players into thinking someone holds authority they do not. Mountain Interactive staff, especially executives like David, maintain recognizable in-game appearances to uphold visibility and trust within the community. Attempting to replicate this appearance undermines that. [Section 1.6] of our rules, "Do not impersonate staff or community leadership in any form," directly applies to this situation. Even if no words were exchanged, visual impersonation still constitutes misrepresentation and violates trust-based rules. Outcome: Warning will remain on record. No further action is being taken unless repeated. The user is advised not to wear combinations intended to resemble leadership members. Future intentional mimicry of any staff or leadership figure — visual or behavioral — may result in escalated moderation, including suspension or permanent ban. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: Oddi_009 (Roblox ID: 649652896) Discord ID: 624286629061722134 (oddi.09#0964) Ban Type: Discord Ban Ban Reason: No reason provided (Banned via Discord API) Staff Member: Unknown Game Ban Status: Blacklist previously active but has since been lifted. Summary of Appeal: The user states they were previously blacklisted in-game with a “no appeal” status, which has now been resolved. They are no longer banned from the game but remain banned from the Mountain Interactive Discord server. The user does not recall a specific incident that would justify the Discord ban and requests re-entry into the community, citing positive past RP interactions and community involvement. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Discord Reinstatement Granted After a full review: The original Discord ban appears to have been applied via API without a logged reason or staff note. No moderation history exists on Discord indicating misconduct that would justify a continued ban. The in-game blacklist has already been resolved, confirming the user has been given a second chance within the platform. Outcome: The user’s Discord ban will be lifted. The user is expected to review and follow all community guidelines moving forward: https://mountaininteractive.com/rules Any future violations may result in reinstated disciplinary action, including a re-ban from the server or platform. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team For support: [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: macross_rb1x Discord ID: 829402675522437151 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Racism Staff Member: glocky.ca Prior Moderation History: Mute (1 Day) issued on 10/23/2023 by ash.z – Reason: “Stupid” Ban (Permanent) issued on 01/13/2024 by glocky.ca – Reason: “Racism” Summary of Appeal: The user claims their ban was based on a fabricated screenshot that falsely shows them using racist language. They state the image was created by an individual with a personal grudge, who allegedly has a history of faking evidence against others. macross_rb1x insists they never sent any message containing racial slurs and that no message ID or supporting log was provided by the staff member who issued the ban. They request the removal of the ban and reinstatement to their former trial moderator position. Findings: The evidence submitted at the time of the ban was a standalone screenshot lacking metadata or a message ID. There is no supporting message log or confirmation that the content in question existed in Mountain Interactive servers. The user has no history of similar behavior or V-TOS breaches related to racism prior to this case. The staff member who issued the ban has since left the team, and their ban practices have been flagged for inconsistencies in other cases. The user’s past moderation note labeled “stupid” does not indicate a pattern of discriminatory or malicious behavior. Final Decision: ✅ Appeal Accepted – Ban Reversed After reviewing the situation, the ban was not properly substantiated by reliable or verifiable evidence. A permanent ban for racism requires clear, authenticated proof—especially when the claim is serious. In this case, the evidence did not meet Mountain Interactive’s standards for moderation. Outcome: The permanent ban will be lifted. The user may return to the community under normal terms. Reinstatement to a staff position is not guaranteed and will be discussed separately if appropriate. Any future behavior violations—especially involving discriminatory conduct—will result in permanent removal without reconsideration. Reviewed by: Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: accessorie Discord ID: 1256422785576734741 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Reason: V-TOS – Distribution of Inappropriate Content Involving a Minor Staff Action Date: Logged prior to April 2025 Content Reviewed: GIF linked by user Summary of Appeal:The user states they were banned for V-TOS after sharing a GIF, claiming it was their first offense and requesting reentry into the Discord server. They apologized for their actions and emphasized a desire to rejoin the community for future updates and engagement. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Serious Community Safety ViolationAfter reviewing the GIF and internal logs: The image submitted contains sexually suggestive material appearing to involve a child or childlike figure, which is strictly prohibited in all forms, regardless of context, style, or humor intent. Under [Rule 1.2] Prohibited Content, this is classified as: Even if the user intended it as a joke or meme, this kind of content is non-negotiable and not protected under comedic intent. Mountain Interactive operates with zero tolerance for such content to protect our users and maintain legal and ethical compliance. Outcome:Permanent ban will remain in effect across all platforms. The user is not eligible for future appeal due to the nature of the violation. Any attempt to circumvent this restriction (via alts or name changes) will result in immediate removal. Mountain Interactive’s safety policies are firm to ensure a community free from dangerous, inappropriate, or predatory behavior—even in meme form. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review Decision (Account Information Forwarded to Local Law Enforcement)Appealing User: yarik_yav Roblox ID: Not provided Discord ID: 1353103787652419697 (Confirmed in moderation logs) Ban Type: Permanent Ban Reason: V-TOS – Inappropriate Image Content Staff Member: unlimitedrp Ban Reference: Case #10309 – April 14, 2025 Violation Details: User posted a GIF in RP chat that briefly depicted a child without clothing, deleted within seconds. Staff immediately banned across platforms after review. Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges sending an inappropriate GIF to the roleplay chat but states they deleted it within 2–3 seconds. They admit the action was a mistake, express remorse, and request a second chance to return to the community. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Severe Violation of Platform & Legal Standards After full review of moderation logs and user’s explanation: The content posted — even if deleted shortly after — was flagged and confirmed to show a child without clothing, which constitutes a direct violation of both Mountain Interactive’s rules and applicable laws regarding prohibited content. According to [Mountain Interactive Community Rules – Section 1.2: Prohibited Content]: Whether posted intentionally or by accident, distributing this type of media is non-negotiable and cannot be justified by immediate deletion. Posting such content places our community, staff, and platform at risk of legal consequences. Outcome: The ban is permanent and will not be lifted. This user is prohibited from participating in any future Mountain Interactive platforms, services, or communities. Attempts to return under alternate accounts will be automatically banned and logged. No further appeals will be considered. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Corporate & Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review Decision(CEASE AND DESIST FORWARDED / HARRASMENT)Appealing User: ztassin55 Discord ID: 1295192413765369898 Original Discord ID (prior to switch): 1039376290265960508 Ban Type: Permanent Discord Ban Ban Reason: Impersonation – Participation in a fake “Mountain Studios” server Staff Member: Ash (Corporate Team) Appeal Thread: Original Appeal Thread on MI Forums Summary of Appeal: The user was banned for being involved in a fake “Mountain Studios” Discord server that attempted to impersonate Mountain Interactive’s branding. The user states they joined the server “to check it out,” did not realize they were given a high-ranking role, and claims they were offline for a few days before discovering they were banned from the main Mountain Interactive Discord. They also stated they intended to leave the impersonation server afterward. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Involvement in Brand Impersonation Server After reviewing internal logs and the appeal: The user was banned for impersonation as part of a mass moderation action taken against participants in a Discord server that misrepresented itself as affiliated with Mountain Interactive (a violation of Discord’s ToS and MI’s community rules). Regardless of whether or not the user created or actively moderated the server, being listed with a high-ranking role in an impersonation server is taken seriously. This role was not automatically assigned and indicates a perceived level of trust or involvement. [Section 1.5] of our Community Rules ("Common Sense & Community Trust") makes clear that: While the user claims they were unaware and intended to leave, this explanation was only provided after the ban and there is no proactive record of them reporting the impersonation or distancing themselves beforehand. Outcome: Ban will remain in effect. Participation in impersonation efforts — even passively — erodes the trust required for our community. No further appeals will be considered unless verifiable proof is provided that the user had no knowledge or involvement in the impersonation effort at the time. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: sens (Roblox not listed) Discord ID: 1205177596606681119 Ban Type: Permanent Discord Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS Violation Staff Member: @krovix. Ban Record: Case #10330 Date of Ban: April 18, 2025 Evidence Reviewed: Internal team log for V-TOS Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges their actions and takes full responsibility for inappropriate conduct in the Mountain Interactive Discord server. The appeal expresses remorse for insults directed at another user during a moment of personal frustration. The user states a desire to make amends, redeem themselves, and contribute positively moving forward. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Severity and Context of Violation After careful review of the incident and user history: The user was permanently banned due to behavior that constituted a Violation of Terms of Service (V-TOS) under our Community Guidelines, specifically: [Section 1.3] Respectful Content Only – Users must not engage in personal attacks, threats, or harassment. [Section 1.5] Common Sense & Community Trust – All members are expected to use sound judgment in conduct and communication. The violation involved targeted, aggressive insults toward another community member, which is considered a zero-tolerance offense. Regardless of emotion or frustration, such language and behavior break the core values of our community and Discord policies. While the apology is acknowledged and appreciated, the nature and severity of the violation, along with the user’s prior standing, do not support reinstatement at this time. Outcome: Discord access remains revoked permanently. No further appeals will be accepted unless substantial, verifiable context or staff error is presented. Any future attempt to bypass this ban via alt accounts will result in additional enforcement actions. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Hello, You are not banned from our discord.

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: mqpf (Discord ID: 1055614304575033394) Ban Type: Permanent (exact length unspecified) Ban Reason: Fabricated Discord Message / Staff Impersonation (V-TOS Violation) Staff Member: david.is59012 Evidence Reviewed: Ban Log Entry: Case #10346, Reason: "bye" Appeal Claim: User asserts they were banned due to a misinterpreted joke, claims David also "joked about it." Context: User generated and shared an inspect-elemental Discord message falsely implying a staff member used a racial slur. Message content was manipulated. Moderation History: Case #10346: Permanent ban for staff-related impersonation/falsified message Case #9279: 2-hour mute for spam after being told to stop (January 4, 2025) Case #7767: Warning for inappropriate language (July 15, 2024) Summary of Appeal: The user claims they did not engage in any wrongdoing and asserts the ban was related to a joke or error. However, logs and context confirm the user manually manipulated a Discord message via browser tools to make it appear as if a staff member said a slur, then posted or circulated that image. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Serious Violation of Community Trust The offense directly violates multiple rules: [Section 1.5] Community Trust and Common Sense [Section 1.9] Forging, Falsifying, or Manipulating Evidence [Section 1.8] Platform Integrity (includes inspect element abuse or impersonation) Falsifying staff messages, especially those involving racial slurs, constitutes a serious breach of trust and damages the integrity of the moderation process and the Mountain Interactive community. This behavior is not tolerated under any circumstance. Outcome: The ban will remain in effect. No further appeals will be accepted at this time. Users are reminded that impersonation, falsified messages, or misuse of developer tools to alter appearance of content is treated as an extreme violation. This type of conduct places undue strain on moderation staff and creates confusion or reputational harm to others. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: mindpaced (Roblox ID: 3220915670) Discord ID: 1203536098609864728 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service) Staff Member: cruz8792 Ban Date: April 20, 2025 Case ID: 10348 Summary of Appeal:The user admits to making an inappropriate joke in-game, stating they are 13 years old and didn’t intend harm. They express regret for their “immature” behavior, acknowledging the comment came across as “gross.” The appeal emphasizes that the intent was humor, not malice, and asks for leniency as a younger player who made a mistake. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Violation ConfirmedAfter reviewing the case and moderation context: The V-TOS violation involved inappropriate and offensive language that breached the community’s core standards for respectful behavior. Regardless of age or intent, Mountain Interactive maintains a zero-tolerance policy for comments that violate Section 1.1 – Respectful Content Only, which prohibits sexual, explicit, or grossly inappropriate remarks. Admitting the joke was “gross” and that it “went too far” confirms awareness that the behavior was not acceptable. Purchasing game passes or using Robux does not justify or excuse behavior that makes the environment unsafe for others. Outcome:The permanent ban will remain in place. No further appeals will be reviewed unless significant time has passed and proof of behavior change is provided. We encourage all players to review our rules at mountaininteractive.com/rules before participating in the community again in the future. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected]

Final Decision: ✅ No Action Needed – Warning Not FoundAfter reviewing the moderation records, there is no active warning for LTAP on your account as of April 17, 2025. It's likely the staff member you spoke with already removed it or the warning was never formally added. No further action is required, and your record remains clean in regard to this issue. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: ZenixSin (Roblox ID: 4865908504) Discord ID: 1134500215982927962 Warning Type: FRP (Fail Roleplay) Game: Los Angeles Warning Date: January 31, 2025 Staff Member: wil Evidence Reviewed: Original Clip Attached to Warning Summary of Appeal:The user claims the evidence related to their FRP warning is no longer available and requests removal based on the lack of accessible proof. They express a willingness to accept responsibility if the action did occur, stating they want to improve and maintain a clean record. Final Decision: ❌ Warning Upheld – Evidence Confirms ViolationUpon full review: The video is still active and viewable via YouTube and was included in the original moderation log. The clip clearly shows the user engaging in behavior that meets the criteria for FailRP, including unrealistic actions within a public RP environment that disrupt standard gameplay. The user has a long pattern of rule violations, including: 3 bans (1 of which included FRP and NITRP as recently as March) This warning occurred right between two FRP-related bans Multiple FRP-linked actions across January to March, some of which were appealed and reduced, indicating leniency already provided Violated Rule(s):[2.5] Fail Roleplay (FRP) “Engaging in actions that are unrealistic or outside the boundaries of reasonable RP... includes but is not limited to unrealistic driving, combat behavior, or character conduct.” Outcome:The warning will remain on the user’s record Continued trend of FRP-related incidents indicates this warning was part of a broader behavioral concern Any future issues of the same type may result in stricter disciplinary action The user is encouraged to focus on long-term improvement and utilize the Mountain Interactive Rules as a guide to avoid further sanctions. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: oliveiras9 (Roblox ID: 121407699) Discord ID: 525526242682994692 Warning Type: NLR (New Life Rule) & SI (Scene Interference) Game: Perris, California Warning Date: April 16, 2025 Staff Member: pokedigge900 Evidence Reviewed: Video Logs via Staff Report (Discord Media): Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Moderation History: 3 warnings including LTAA (Jan 8), PD (June 2024), and current NLR/SI 1 prior day ban for FRP (Mar 23, 2025) Recent kick for NLR (April 9) Moderation history indicates repeated RP violations within 30 days Summary of Appeal: The user argues that they did not violate NLR, as they did not return to the specific location where they died, and instead responded to a new location based on fresh information relayed through in-character communication (VC/radio). They also claim that Scene Interference (SI) does not apply because they were a party member rejoining a related but geographically separate encounter. Final Decision: ❌ Warning Upheld – Improper Re-entry into Active Scene After full review of the videos and appeal: In the footage, the user is confirmed to have died in a shootout and re-engaged in the same scenario shortly after through proximity and continued involvement with their group. While they may not have returned to the exact GPS coordinates of their death, the new entry into the evolving same pursuit is still considered part of the original scene, violating NLR guidelines: Furthermore, their re-entry mid-pursuit without visible re-initiation RP or valid justification aligns with: The rules also explicitly restrict re-involvement via alternate positioning when the scene is still active, even with VC or team communication. Scene continuity and realism are expected to be respected even across map zones. Outcome: ⚠️ Warning for NLR and SI will remain on the user’s record Due to repeated infractions, continued disregard for RP boundaries may result in elevated future actions User is advised to avoid all related scenes after death, regardless of location, and allow a full reset period before rejoining ongoing events — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Warning Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: hatchetrat (Roblox ID not provided) Discord ID: 805128357254529044 Warning Type: FRP (Fail Roleplay) Game: Perris, California Warning Date: February 10, 2024 Staff Member: Not listed (staff member no longer with the team) Evidence Reviewed: No evidence was attached to the original warning No context logs, video, or explanation found on file Moderation History: User currently has no other active FRP warnings or recent similar violations Previous RDM warning recently overturned due to confirmed staff misapplication User maintains clean conduct record for the past year Summary of Appeal: The user is requesting removal of an old FRP warning from over a year ago. They state there was no video or report message ever sent to them, and they have no memory of being spoken to about the violation. The user emphasizes that they’ve grown since the time it was issued and have followed the rules consistently since then. Final Decision: ✅ Warning Removed – No Record or Evidence on File After reviewing available records: There is no attached video, mod note, or summary supporting the original FRP warning. Additionally, the issuing staff member is no longer on the moderation team, and we have no context to evaluate the action. Given that this warning is over a year old, was never acknowledged through direct message or review, and the user has maintained a clean record since, we consider this warning expired and improperly documented. Outcome: FRP warning from February 2024 has been removed from the user’s record No further action will be taken User is encouraged to continue their positive contribution to the community and maintain clean RP standards moving forward — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Updated Final Decision (with video confirmation):Warning Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: hatchetrat (Roblox ID not provided) Discord ID: 805128357254529044 Warning Type: RDM Game: Perris, California Warning Date: March 25, 2025 Staff Member: Not listed Evidence Reviewed: Clip Provided — originally submitted in a player report Video clearly shows the user being randomly killed without provocation or engagement Moderation History: No prior warnings or bans referenced No other actions tied to this incident Summary of Appeal: The user claims they were incorrectly warned when submitting a report. The evidence they originally provided was misapplied to them instead of the offending party, and they now request the warning be removed from their record. Final Decision: ✅ Warning Removed – Incorrect Application Confirmed After reviewing the video and appeal details: It’s clear that the user was the victim of RDM, not the offender. The video shows no roleplay initiation or hostile intent from the appealing user, confirming that the warning was mistakenly issued. This has now been corrected. Outcome: RDM warning has been fully cleared from the user’s record No additional action needed Staff will internally review this type of issue to prevent mislabeling reports in the future — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Updated Final Decision: ❌ Warning Upheld – Use of Lethal Force Without Clear JustificationWhile the appeal showed a genuine misunderstanding of the situation, and the player may not have intended to RDM, the clip clearly shows the user opening fire on a player who was not posing an active threat, violating: [Section 2.2] – PvP Guidelines [Section 2.1] – Roleplay Integrity (Lethal force must be reactive or properly escalated) There is no indication the other player fired or aimed at the officer, and the area was not clearly marked as an active threat zone. Officers must verify threats and use non-lethal options or voice warnings before engaging civilians or armed individuals who are not attacking. Outcome: Warning will remain on record No escalation to further action User is advised to review proper use of force standards when roleplaying as law enforcement to avoid future warnings — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: GamingFu1give (Roblox ID: 2678997714) Discord ID: 1128773394121375814 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: AA (Alt Accounting) Staff Member: Ash Z. Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 65053 – Alt account usage Linked alt account: BUG6Tennis User was under One Strike Policy at the time of violation Moderation History: No prior warnings or kicks Placed under One Strike Policy on January 12, 2025 Permanently banned on January 31, 2025 for ban evasion via alternate account No appeals submitted prior to this request Summary of Appeal: The user acknowledges being banned for alt accounting and additional rule violations such as fail driving and ignoring combat timers. They state that after taking time away from Roblox, they now better understand the rules and would like a second chance to return and follow them properly. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – One Strike Policy Violation The user was placed under an active One Strike Policy before this incident. Despite that, they attempted to bypass enforcement by accessing the game using an alternate account, directly violating: [Section 5.2] – Ban Evasion and Account Circumvention [Section 2.1] – General RP Guidelines (FailRP) [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust The One Strike Policy is clearly outlined and non-negotiable once a final enforcement occurs. This ban was the result of a confirmed violation after that policy was applied, and the appeal does not directly acknowledge or take accountability for that agreement. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in effect User may reapply for appeal no earlier than 60 days from today, and only with a full acknowledgment of the One Strike Policy terms Any further attempts to rejoin using other accounts will result in full platform-level removal from the community — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Appeal Format invalid - Resubmit appeal with proper format

Ban Appeal Review Decision Appealing User: Bummel100 (Roblox ID: 2908639666) Discord ID: N/A Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: V-TOS (Violation of Terms of Service) Staff Member: AerialOperations Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 62926 – V-TOS Moderator Log: Discord Reference Prior Ban ID 58784 – LTAA, RDM (with clip) Moderation History: 1 prior short-term ban for LTAA and RDM 1 permanent ban for V-TOS (inappropriate language or content) No prior warnings on record Summary of Appeal: The user claims confusion about the meaning of "V-TOS" and denies making any offensive or slur-based remarks, stating they only said "hawk tuah." They assert a case of mistaken identity and request to be unbanned, apologizing generally for any harm caused while also denying the specific behavior they were banned for. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – V-TOS Violation Confirmed After reviewing the evidence and moderator notes: The V-TOS ban was issued based on direct moderation review of chat logs, where the user made comments containing filtered and inappropriate terms in public or proximity chat. This violates: [Section 1.1] – Respectful Content Only [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance While the user disputes making the specific statement that resulted in the ban, the reviewing moderator verified the log prior to enforcement. In cases of V-TOS or inappropriate content, staff actions are not taken lightly and must be supported by clear evidence. The user's prior ban for RDM and LTAA also establishes a minor but relevant pattern of disruptive behavior, further reducing the benefit of the doubt in this case. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in place No further appeals will be accepted unless new, clear evidence emerges showing this ban was issued in error Users are reminded that filtered, disrespectful, or inappropriate language — even if said jokingly — is subject to permanent removal under community standards — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: 3xFyQRN (Roblox ID: 1770409289) Discord ID: 888678471688155196 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: Exploiting (EXP), followed by alternate account usage Staff Member: RylanBLP Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID not listed in system, but logged in moderation archives Initial admission of exploiting User’s own statement confirming alt usage following ban Moderation History: Confirmed use of exploits to track and locate another player Admitted alt usage to bypass permanent ban No prior warnings or bans before the exploiting incident, but the nature of the offense bypasses standard escalation Summary of Appeal: The user admits to using exploits during a heated moment after being killed and robbed in-game. Instead of reporting through proper channels, they used unfair methods to track the player. After being banned, the user also admits they created and played on an alternate account. They now express remorse for both offenses, stating they’ve stopped exploiting, played fairly on the alt, and made new friends in the community. The appeal requests forgiveness and reinstatement based on time passed and growth since the incident. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Exploitation and Ban Evasion After reviewing the appeal and the user's full acknowledgment of behavior: The use of exploits to gain an advantage in a PvP or economy-based roleplay scenario is a severe breach of trust and directly violates: [Section 2.6] – Use of Exploits, Scripts, or External Tools [Section 5.0] – Platform Integrity & Staff Compliance [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust This situation was further escalated by the user’s deliberate choice to evade the permanent ban by creating and using an alternate account, which violates: [Section 5.2] – Ban Evasion and Account Circumvention While the appeal is well-written and sincere, and the user demonstrates an understanding of the impact their behavior caused, the combination of confirmed exploiting followed by ban evasion removes the opportunity for reconsideration at this time. Outcome: Appeal denied. The permanent ban remains in effect Any attempts to rejoin under a different account will result in additional enforcement If a future appeal is submitted, it must be at least 6 months from the date of this decision and include proof of continued commitment to fair play and community trust Mountain Interactive does not tolerate exploiters or players who knowingly bypass enforcement decisions. — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]

Ban Appeal Review DecisionAppealing User: PedroXD2008 (Roblox ID: 89886027) Discord ID: 1032432355408879737 Ban Type: Permanent Ban Ban Reason: RDM Staff Member: InternalHypothesis Evidence Reviewed: Ban ID 70207 – RDM Evidence Clip Prior Ban ID 57926 – x1 RDM Ban ID 58175 – RDM Warning ID 17843 – RDM Clip Moderation History: 3 RDM bans total, progressively increasing in severity 1 active RDM warning All offenses are combat-related with no sign of improvement or behavior correction Summary of Appeal: The user explains they were in an apartment doing illegal RP activity and claims they assumed the officer outside was preparing to arrest or kill them. In response to what they describe as fear of losing in-game assets, they preemptively shot the officer before any interaction was initiated. They acknowledge being scared but state they don’t believe a permanent ban is necessary. Final Decision: ❌ Appeal Denied – Repeated RDM Behavior After reviewing the clip and appeal: The video shows the user exiting the apartment and immediately opening fire on the officer without any direct threat or provocation. This was a clear instance of random deathmatch, violating the following rules: [Section 2.2] – Player vs. Player (PvP) Rules [Section 2.1] – Not in the Roleplay / Poor RP Initiation [Section 1.5] – Common Sense & Community Trust This marks the fourth separate RDM-related action on the user’s record, following multiple prior bans and a warning. Despite progressive discipline, the user has failed to adjust their behavior. The explanation offered (“I was scared of being arrested”) does not justify or excuse a lethal preemptive attack without roleplay initiation. Outcome: Permanent ban will remain in place Further appeals will not be reviewed unless significant time has passed and a detailed explanation of reform is submitted User has demonstrated repeated disregard for roleplay and combat standards, disrupting the RP experience for others — Reviewed by the Mountain Interactive Moderation Team https://mountaininteractive.com/rules [email protected]